Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS

被引:1248
作者
Opricovic, S
Tzeng, GH
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Management Technol, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[2] Fac Civil Engn, YU-11000 Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
multiple criteria analysis; compromise; VIKOR; TOPSIS; comparison;
D O I
10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods VIKOR and TOPSIS are based on an aggregating function representing "closeness to the ideal", which originated in the compromise programming method. In VIKOR linear normalization and in TOPSIS vector normalization is used to eliminate the units of criterion functions. The VIKOR method of compromise ranking determines a compromise solution, providing a maximum "group utility" for the "majority" and a minimum of an individual regret for the "opponent". The TOPSIS method determines a solution with the shortest distance to the ideal solution and the greatest distance from the negative-ideal solution, but it does not consider the relative importance of these distances. A comparative analysis of these two methods is illustrated with a numerical example, showing their similarity and some differences. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 455
页数:11
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, LECT NOTES ECON M, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5
[2]  
Brans J.P., 1984, OPERATIONAL RES, P477, DOI DOI 10.1007/0-387-23081-5_
[3]   Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights [J].
Deng, H ;
Yeh, CH ;
Willis, RJ .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (10) :963-973
[4]   MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION IN RIVER BASIN DEVELOPMENT [J].
DUCKSTEIN, L ;
OPRICOVIC, S .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1980, 16 (01) :14-20
[5]  
Hwang C.L., 1981, GIORN ECON ANN ECON
[6]  
Lai Y.J., 1994, Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making, Methods and Applications
[7]   TOPSIS FOR MODM [J].
LAI, YJ ;
LIU, TY ;
HWANG, CL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1994, 76 (03) :486-500
[8]   WEIGHT STABILITY INTERVALS IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION AID [J].
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1988, 33 (01) :54-64
[9]   Comparison of three multicriteria methods to predict known outcomes [J].
Olson, DL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 130 (03) :576-587
[10]  
OPTICOVIC S, 1998, MULTICRITERIA OPTIMI