The impact of individual differences on influence strategies

被引：50
作者：
Alkis, Nurcan [1 ]
Temizel, Tugba Taskaya [1 ]
机构：
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Inst Informat, Dept Informat Syst, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
来源：
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES | 2015年 / 87卷
关键词：
Big Five; Personality traits; Bayesian SEM; Influence principles; Persuasion; 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS; PERFORMANCE; CONSCIENTIOUSNESS; RECIPROCITY; VALIDATION;
D O I：
10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.037
中图分类号：
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号：
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要：
Persuasion and its applications aim at positively changing human behavior and they work the best when they are tailored to individuals. Recent studies show that individuals could give different responses to the same persuasion strategies which lead to personalization of persuasion strategies for better effectiveness. This study investigates what persuasion strategies are more effective for whom. More specifically, the relationship between the Big Five Personality traits (extraversion, neuroticism, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness) and six persuasion strategies (authority, reciprocation, scarcity, liking, commitment and consensus) is explored. This study was conducted with 381 university students. A structured questionnaire comprising the Big Five Inventory Personality Trait scale and the Susceptibility to Persuasion Strategies scale was used to collect data. The Bayesian estimation was employed to reveal causal relationships. The results show that there are significant relations between personality traits and influence strategies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：147 / 152
页数：6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [11] Representative trust and reciprocity: Prevalence and determinants
    Dohmen, Thomas
    Falk, Armin
    Huffman, David
    Sunde, Uwe
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2008, 46 (01) : 84 - 90
  • [12] Fogg BJ, 2003, Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do
  • [13] Gelman A., 2004, BAYESIAN DATA ANAL, VThird, DOI [10.1186/1754-1611-9-2, DOI 10.1186/1754-1611-9-2]
  • [14] THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY - A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
    GOULDNER, AW
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1960, 25 (02) : 161 - 178
  • [15] Guido G., 2006, Innovative marketing, V2, P57
  • [16] Halevi T., 2013, ARXIV13017643
  • [17] Halko S, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6137, P150, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_16
  • [18] Personalized Persuasion: Tailoring Persuasive Appeals to Recipients' Personality Traits
    Hirsh, Jacob B.
    Kang, Sonia K.
    Bodenhausen, Galen V.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (06) : 578 - 581
  • [19] Hoyle R. H., 2012, Handbook of structural equation modeling
  • [20] THE EFFECT OF MONETARY INCENTIVES AND FOLLOW-UP MAILINGS ON THE RESPONSE RATE AND RESPONSE QUALITY IN MAIL SURVEYS
    JAMES, JM
    BOLSTEIN, R
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1990, 54 (03) : 346 - 361
1234