Aspects of animal welfare protection at stunning and slaughter procedures of fish

被引:0
|
作者
Kleingeld, Dirk Willem [1 ]
机构
[1] Task Force Vet, Nds Landesamt Verbraucherschutz & Lebensmittelsic, D-30173 Hannover, Germany
来源
FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT | 2013年 / 93卷 / 04期
关键词
Fish; New aquacultures species; Animal welfare provisions; Stunning methods; Killing methods; CATFISH CLARIAS-GARIEPINUS; TROUT ONCORHYNCHUS-MYKISS; WATER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Animal welfare provisions define stunning and slaughter procedures for fish intended for human consumption in Germany. With respect to stunning and the slaughter of fish, these national regulations go far beyond EU regulations. However, especially with regard to new aquaculture species (e.g. African Catfish), the suitability of fish stunning and killing methods approved by German law must be particularly questioned. Adspective findings, such as the loss of equilibrium or absence of the vestibulo-ocular reflex are important for the assessment of stunning or killing methods from the point of view of animal welfare. Nevertheless, an animal welfare assessment of fish stunning or killing methods based on adspective findings can not be achieved for all fish species. The stunning of fish by means of a percussive blow must be classified as a humane method. However, this method can not be applied to all fish species or for the stunning of larger fish quantities. Electrical stunning or the administration of anesthetic drugs can be generally classified as humane methods as well. Nevertheless, the electrical stunning is not applicable to all fish species. Furthermore there is a lack of scientific knowledge and a necessity for setting up standards in relation to the current parameters to be used for electrical stunning. For legal reasons, the use of anaesthetic substances for stunning or killing of fish for food purposes is not possible in Germany. The use of carbon dioxide for the stunning or killing of salmonids should be considered as not humane. The legal animal welfare regulations in Germany provide only a limited suitable framework for stunning or killing of fish intended for human consumption under field conditions. Especially for new aquaculture species there is a need for the development of animal welfare compatible methods for stunning and/or killing of fish under practical conditions as well as for the establishment of standards, especially for the application of electrical stunning methods. The carbon dioxide exposure should be deleted as an approved method for stunning or killing of salmonids.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 192
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Farmed fish welfare during slaughter in Italy: survey on stunning and killing methods and indicators of unconsciousness
    Clemente, Gianfilippo Alessio
    Tolini, Clara
    Boscarino, Andrea
    Lorenzi, Valentina
    Dal Lago, Tania Lidia
    Benedetti, Daniele
    Bellucci, Fabio
    Manfrin, Amedeo
    Trocino, Angela
    Nodari, Sara Rota
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [2] Electro-Immobilisation and Fish Welfare: An Investigation into Stress, Consciousness, and Physiological Aspects During Slaughter
    Dehcheshmeh, Afshin Mohammadi
    Khosravizadeh, Mohammad
    Mousavi, Seyed Mohammad
    Babadi, Sedigheh
    Shiry, Nima
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2024, : 243 - 258
  • [3] Humane Slaughter of Carp - A Comparison between Three Stunning Procedures
    Daskalova, Aleksandra
    Pavlov, Alexander
    Kyuchukova, Ralica
    Daskalov, Hristo
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2016, 16 (04) : 753 - 758
  • [4] Food Safety considerations of animal welfare aspects of husbandry systems for farmed fish
    Andreoletti, Olivier
    Budka, Herbert
    Buncic, Sava
    Colin, Pierre
    Collins, John D.
    De Koeijer, Aline
    Griffin, John
    Havelaar, Arie
    Hope, James
    Klein, Guenter
    Kruse, Hilde
    Magnino, Simone
    Lopez, Antonio Martinez
    McLauchlin, James
    Nguyen-The, Christophe
    Noeckler, Karsten
    Noerrung, Birgit
    Maradona, Miguel Prieto
    Roberts, Terence
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2008, 6 (12)
  • [5] SPECIES-SPECIFIC WELFARE ASPECTS OF THE MAIN SYSTEMS OF STUNNING AND KILLING OF FARMED ATLANTIC SALMON Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare
    Algers, Bo
    Blokhuis, Harry J.
    Botner, Anette
    Broom, Donald M.
    Costa, Patrizia
    Domingo, Mariano
    Greiner, Mathias
    Hartung, Joerg
    Koenen, Frank
    Mueller-Graf, Christine
    Morton, David B.
    Osterhaus, Albert
    Pfeiffer, Dirk U.
    Raj, Mohan
    Roberts, Ronald
    Sanaa, Moez
    Salman, Mo
    Sharp, J. Michael
    Vannier, Philippe
    Wierup, Martin
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (04)
  • [6] Use of electroencephalogram (EEG) to optimize stunning efficiency and animal welfare in commercial catfish production
    Hjelmstedt, Per
    To, Filip
    Grans, Albin
    Allen, Peter
    AQUACULTURE, 2024, 592
  • [8] Lack of knowledge does not justify a lack of action: the case for animal welfare in farmed fish
    Lugert, Vincent
    Steinhagen, Dieter
    Reiser, Stefan
    LANDBAUFORSCHUNG-JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AND ORGANIC AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2020, 70 (01): : 31 - 34
  • [9] The Canadian harp seal hunt: observations on the effectiveness of procedures to avoid poor animal welfare outcomes
    Daoust, P-Y
    Caraguel, C.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2012, 21 (04) : 445 - 455
  • [10] Periods for growth and quality improvement of fish in context of animal welfare compliant management of commercial fish ponds - a literature review
    Pietrock, Michael
    Bramick, Uwe
    BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2016, 129 (5-6): : 234 - 241