3D numerical analyses of geosynthetic encased stone columns

被引:64
|
作者
Keykhosropur, L. [1 ]
Soroush, A. [1 ]
Imam, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tehran 158754413, Iran
关键词
Ground improvement; Stone column; Geosynthetic encased columns; Finite element method; 3D analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.07.005
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Stone columns are commonly used as ground improvement elements since they act as reinforcing inclusions. However, due to the lack of sufficient lateral confinement for the columns, this technique is not applicable for the improvement of grounds that consist of very soft soils. In order to provide lateral confinement and increase the load bearing capacity of stone columns installed in very soft clay soils, they are usually encased with suitable geosynthetic materials, forming geosynthetic-encased columns (GECs). In this paper, a 3D numerical approach is used to study the effect of varying the encasement length of different columns of a group of GECs on the overall group behavior. These results are compared with those obtained from a group of fully encased columns, through comparison of the settlements and lateral deformations (bulging) of the columns. The analyses are calibrated through modeling the behavior of GECs used in a ground reclamation project in Hamburg, Germany. Parametric studies are also carried out to investigate the effects of factors such as stiffness of the geosynthetic encasement, column diameter, and modulus of elasticity and friction angle of the column material on the overall behavior of the GEC group. The results indicated that encasing only the outer columns of the stone column group is sufficient in providing an optimal design. It was also shown that increasing the stiffness of the encasement and the column diameter enhance the overall behavior of the GEC group through increasing the overall stiffness of the stone columns and the ratio of the soft soil replaced by the stone columns (i.e. the area replacement ratio), respectively. Moreover, it was observed that the performance of GECs is comparatively less sensitive to the internal friction angle of the column material, and that, in general, the modulus of elasticity of the column material has only a small effect on the group behavior. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 68
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experimental Studies on Bearing Capacity of Geosynthetic Reinforced Stone Columns
    Javad Nazari Afshar
    Mahmoud Ghazavi
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2014, 39 : 1559 - 1571
  • [32] Shear Load Tests on Stone Columns With and Without Geosynthetic Encasement
    Murugesan, S.
    Rajagopal, K.
    GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2009, 32 (01): : 76 - 85
  • [33] 3D Numerical Analyses for Optimization of Deep-Mixing Columns Combined by Raft Foundations
    Mohammad Oliaei
    Heisam Heidarzadeh
    Saman Mansouri
    Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2021, 51 : 1338 - 1348
  • [34] Numerical study on ground improvement for liquefaction mitigation using stone columns encased with geosynthetics
    Tang, Liang
    Cong, Shengyi
    Ling, Xianzhang
    Lu, Jinchi
    Elgamal, Ahmed
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2015, 43 (02) : 190 - 195
  • [35] 3D Numerical Analyses for Optimization of Deep-Mixing Columns Combined by Raft Foundations
    Oliaei, Mohammad
    Heidarzadeh, Heisam
    Mansouri, Saman
    INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 51 (06) : 1338 - 1348
  • [36] Performance of quasilinear elastic constitutive models in simulation of geosynthetic encased columns
    Khabbazian, Majid
    Kaliakin, Victor N.
    Meehan, Christopher L.
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2011, 38 (08) : 998 - 1007
  • [37] Undrained stability analysis of embankments supported on geosynthetic encased granular columns
    Mohapatra, S. R.
    Rajagopal, K.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 24 (05) : 465 - 479
  • [38] Geosynthetic Encased Column: comparison between numerical and experimental results
    Alkhorshid, Nima Rostami
    Silva Araujo, Gregorio Luis
    Palmeira, Ennio Marques
    SOILS AND ROCKS, 2021, 44 (04):
  • [39] Effect of Construction Method on the Performance of Ordinary and Geotextile-Encased Stone Columns
    Javad Nazariafshar
    Ali Shafiee
    Nima Mehrannia
    Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2022, 46 : 4751 - 4761
  • [40] Modeling the Behavior of Geosynthetic Encased Columns: Influence of Granular Soil Constitutive Model
    Kaliakin, Victor N.
    Khabbazian, Majid
    Meehan, Christopher L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2012, 12 (04) : 357 - 369