Exploring micromobility services: Characteristics of station-based bike-sharing users and their relationship with dockless services

被引:12
|
作者
Arias-Molinares, Daniela [1 ]
Julio, Raky [2 ]
Garcia-Palomares, Juan C. [1 ]
Gutierrez, Javier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Transport Infrastruct & Terr Res Grp, Prof Aranguren SN,Ciudad Univ, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Transport Res Ctr, TRANSyT, Madrid, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF URBAN MOBILITY | 2021年 / 1卷
关键词
Shared mobility; Micromobility; Docked; Dockless; Bike-sharing; Scooter-sharing; RELOCATION STRATEGY; PROGRAMS; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.urbmob.2021.100010
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
As shared mobility burst in different cities as one of the most innovative transport solutions, few efforts are found related to the exploration of dockless services and more specifically, to analysing opinions from those users that are subscribed to both, docked and dockless services simultaneously. Therefore, our study explores station-based bike-sharing users' preferences for other dockless services. To that end, we firstly divide the sample into two groups: Group 1 being users that only use Bicimad (Madrid's station-based bike-sharing) and Group 2 being Bicimad users that are also subscribed to other dockless services. Results show that both groups have similar users' profiles according to their socio-demographic characteristics (male, 35-49 years old, well-educated, medium income and employee), although Group 2 shows a slightly higher rate of under-26-year-olds, which could be supporting the idea that these services are more attractive for the youngest. Moreover, our findings show that approximately 12% of station-based bike-sharing users are also subscribed to dockless services. At a higher rate, those subscribed to dockless services live outside the city centre, where the bike-sharing system is not available, showing that the two models may essentially have a complemental relationship, especially in the peripheries. Finally, results point at the importance of bike-sharing systems having a positive impact on its users, as they are keener to try new dockless options and a reduced willingness to use private cars. Insights may help to better inform public policy and promote the use of shared micromobility.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Electric fence planning for dockless bike-sharing services
    Zhang, Yongping
    Lin, Diao
    Mi, Zhifu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 206 : 383 - 393
  • [2] Comparing the Travel Behavior of Older Users Between Station-Based and Dockless Bike Sharing Systems
    Hua, Mingzhuang
    Chen, Xuewu
    Cheng, Long
    Chen, Jingxu
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2023, 2677 (11) : 111 - 123
  • [3] Shared micromobility and equity: A comparison between station-based, hybrid, and dockless models
    Jin, Scarlett T.
    Sui, Daniel Z.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 129
  • [4] Exploring travel patterns and trip purposes of dockless bike-sharing by analyzing massive bike-sharing data in Shanghai, China
    Xing, Yingying
    Wang, Ke
    Lu, Jian John
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 87
  • [5] Exploring the Multiscale Relationship between the Built Environment and the Metro-Oriented Dockless Bike-Sharing Usage
    Li, Zhitao
    Shang, Yuzhen
    Zhao, Guanwei
    Yang, Muzhuang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (04)
  • [6] Measuring spatial inequalities in the access to station-based bike-sharing in Barcelona using an Adapted Affordability Index
    Anaya-Boig, Esther
    Cebollada, Angel
    Castello Bueno, Marc
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 98
  • [7] Exploring the spatial variations of transfer distances between dockless bike-sharing systems and metros
    Li, Wenxiang
    Chen, Shawen
    Dong, Jieshuang
    Wu, Jingxian
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 92
  • [8] Comparing the Temporal Determinants of Dockless Scooter-share and Station-based Bike-share in Washington, DC
    Younes, Hannah
    Zou, Zhenpeng
    Wu, Jiahui
    Baiocchi, Giovanni
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 134 : 308 - 320
  • [9] The social sustainability of cycling: Assessing equity in the accessibility of bike-sharing services
    Giuffrida, Nadia
    Pilla, Francesco
    Carroll, Paraic
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 106
  • [10] A comparative study of bike-sharing and e-scooter sharing users and services in a college town during COVID-19
    Chahine, Ricardo
    Luo, Hao
    Cai, Hua
    Gkritza, Konstantina
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2024, 15