Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties of the Italian Version of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) Questionnaire

被引:31
作者
Cacchio, Angelo [1 ,2 ]
Necozione, Stefano [3 ]
MacDermid, Joy C. [4 ,5 ]
Rompe, Jan Dirk [6 ]
Maffulli, Nicola [7 ]
di Orio, Ferdinando [3 ]
Santilli, Valter [2 ]
Paoloni, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aquila, Dept Hlth Sci, Phys Med & Rehabil Unit, Sch Med, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, Sch Med, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Aquila, Dept Internal Med & Publ Hlth, Clin Epidemiol Unit, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
[4] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] St Josephs Hlth Ctr, Hand & Upper Limb Ctr, London, ON, Canada
[6] OrthoTrauma Evaluat Ctr, Mainz, Germany
[7] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Ctr Sports & Exercise Med, London, England
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2012年 / 92卷 / 08期
关键词
HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; MEASURING FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; BACK PAIN; VALIDATION; RESPONSIVENESS; STRATEGIES; VALIDITY; SYSTEMS; TIME;
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20110398
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire is a tool designed for self-assessment of forearm pain and disability in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET). However, an Italian version of this questionnaire has not been available. Objective. The aims of this study were: (1) to translate and cross-culturally adapt the PRTEE questionnaire into Italian and (2) to evaluate its measurement properties. Design. This was a longitudinal, observational measurement study. Methods. The PRTEE questionnaire was cross-culturally adapted to Italian according to established guidelines. Ninety-five individuals (41 women, 54 men) with unilateral, imaging-confirmed, chronic LET were selected consecutively to assess the measurement properties of the PRTEE questionnaire. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness were estimated. Results. The Italian version of the PRTEE displayed a high degree of internal consistency, with a Cronbach alpha of .95. The test-retest reliability was high for both short-term and medium-term, with intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) of .95 and .93, respectively. The PRTEE exhibited a strong correlation (r=.77-.91, P<.0001) with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) at the baseline and a moderate correlation (r=.58 -.74, P<.0001) at discharge. The responsiveness was higher for the PRTEE than for the DASH. Limitations. A methodological limitation of the study is that due to the small sample size, a factor analysis was not performed to assess convergent validity. Conclusions. The Italian version of the PRTEE questionnaire is internally consistent, demonstrates expected correlations with other measures, and is more responsive than the DASH in Italian patients with chronic LET.
引用
收藏
页码:1036 / 1045
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research
    Beaton, DE
    Boers, M
    Wells, GA
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [2] Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
    Beaton, DE
    Bombardier, C
    Guillemin, F
    Ferraz, MB
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) : 3186 - 3191
  • [3] Cronbach's alpha
    Bland, JM
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7080) : 572 - 572
  • [4] Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
  • [5] Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life
    Crosby, RD
    Kolotkin, RL
    Williams, GR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (05) : 395 - 407
  • [6] REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES - STATISTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR EVALUATION
    DEYO, RA
    DIEHR, P
    PATRICK, DL
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 12 (04): : S142 - S158
  • [7] Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures
    Farrar, JT
    Portenoy, RK
    Berlin, JA
    Kinman, JL
    Strom, BL
    [J]. PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) : 287 - 294
  • [8] Fleiss JL, 1999, Design and analysis of clinical experiments, DOI [10.1002/9781118032923, DOI 10.1002/9781118032923]
  • [9] Fowler J., 2002, Practical Statistics for Nursing and Health Care
  • [10] CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES
    GUILLEMIN, F
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1995, 24 (02) : 61 - 63