Contractor default prediction model for surety bonding

被引:5
作者
Awad, Adel [1 ]
Fayek, Aminah Robinson [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Hole Sch Construct Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Markin CNRL Nat Resources Engn Facil 1 050, Edmonton, AB T6G 2W2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Hole Sch Construct Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Markin CNRL Nat Resources Engn Facil 3 013, Edmonton, AB T6G 2W2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
construction; contractor default; expert systems; fuzzy logic; surety bonding; AGGREGATION;
D O I
10.1139/L2012-028
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Contractor default is one of the major risks that threaten a project's success in the construction industry. Previous studies have focused mainly on evaluation of the contractor's financial aspects to predict contractor default. There remains a need for a comprehensive model that has the ability to incorporate the evaluation of all the project aspects, project team, contractual risks, and project management evaluation criteria to predict the possibility of a contractor's default on a specific construction project. This paper presents a contractor default prediction model (CDPM) from the surety bonding perspective that incorporates these criteria and uses a fuzzy inference system for reasoning. The CDPM provides a more objective, structured, and comprehensive approach for contractor default prediction for surety practitioners, project owners, and for self-assessment by contractors to reduce the risk of contractor default. The multi-attribute utility function was used to develop a group consensus system (GCS) to aggregate the participating experts' opinions to build the CDPM. The accuracy of the GCS was found to be 91.1%. A novel approach for fuzzy rule base development is applied to develop the rule base for the CDPM. The CDPM was validated using 30 contractor default prediction cases, and the accuracy was found to be 86.5%.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1042
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Expert fuzzy model for avalanche prediction [J].
Vizhakat, M .
DEFENCE SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2003, 53 (04) :443-451
[22]   Model Averaging Is Asymptotically Better Than Model Selection For Prediction [J].
Le, Tri M. ;
Clarke, Bertrand .
JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2022, 23 :1-53
[23]   A fuzzy logic and default reasoning model of social norms and equilibrium selection in games under unforeseen contingencies [J].
Sacconi, Lorenzo ;
Moretti, Stefano .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2008, 16 (01) :59-81
[24]   Development of a Fuzzy Model for Prediction of Elastomer Properties [J].
Bonato, Jasminka ;
Tomac, Nikola ;
Tomas, Vinko .
TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2019, 26 (05) :1505-1509
[25]   ROBUST COMBINATION OF MODEL SELECTION METHODS FOR PREDICTION [J].
Wei, Xiaoqiao ;
Yang, Yuhong .
STATISTICA SINICA, 2012, 22 (03) :1021-1040
[26]   Neural Fuzzy Inference System-Based Weather Prediction Model and Its Precipitation Predicting Experiment [J].
Lu, Jing ;
Xue, Shengjun ;
Zhang, Xiakun ;
Zhang, Shuyu ;
Lu, Wanshun .
ATMOSPHERE, 2014, 5 (04) :788-805
[27]   A measurement model of project control systems success for engineering and construction projects case study: contractor companies in Saudi's petroleum and chemical industry [J].
Jawad, Sahar ;
Ledwith, Ann .
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (03) :1218-1240
[28]   Wood bonding strength sensitivity estimation and power consumption prediction in wood machining process by artificial intelligence methods [J].
Jovic, Srdjan ;
Golubovic, Zoran ;
Stojanovic, Jovan .
SENSOR REVIEW, 2017, 37 (04) :444-447
[29]   Fuzzy logic model for the prediction of cement compressive strength [J].
Akkurt, S ;
Tayfur, G ;
Can, S .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2004, 34 (08) :1429-1433
[30]   A Parameter based ANFIS Model for crop yield prediction [J].
Shastry, Aditya ;
Sanjay, H. A. ;
Hegde, Madhura .
2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ADVANCE COMPUTING CONFERENCE (IACC), 2015, :253-257