Contractor default prediction model for surety bonding

被引:5
作者
Awad, Adel [1 ]
Fayek, Aminah Robinson [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Hole Sch Construct Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Markin CNRL Nat Resources Engn Facil 1 050, Edmonton, AB T6G 2W2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Hole Sch Construct Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Markin CNRL Nat Resources Engn Facil 3 013, Edmonton, AB T6G 2W2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
construction; contractor default; expert systems; fuzzy logic; surety bonding; AGGREGATION;
D O I
10.1139/L2012-028
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Contractor default is one of the major risks that threaten a project's success in the construction industry. Previous studies have focused mainly on evaluation of the contractor's financial aspects to predict contractor default. There remains a need for a comprehensive model that has the ability to incorporate the evaluation of all the project aspects, project team, contractual risks, and project management evaluation criteria to predict the possibility of a contractor's default on a specific construction project. This paper presents a contractor default prediction model (CDPM) from the surety bonding perspective that incorporates these criteria and uses a fuzzy inference system for reasoning. The CDPM provides a more objective, structured, and comprehensive approach for contractor default prediction for surety practitioners, project owners, and for self-assessment by contractors to reduce the risk of contractor default. The multi-attribute utility function was used to develop a group consensus system (GCS) to aggregate the participating experts' opinions to build the CDPM. The accuracy of the GCS was found to be 91.1%. A novel approach for fuzzy rule base development is applied to develop the rule base for the CDPM. The CDPM was validated using 30 contractor default prediction cases, and the accuracy was found to be 86.5%.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1042
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Fuzzy Logic Model System for Prediction of Process Parameters by Plasma Assisted Diffusion Bonding of Dissimilar Alloys [J].
K. Ananthakumar ;
S. Kumaran .
Experimental Techniques, 2019, 43 :105-115
[12]   Fuzzy Logic Model System for Prediction of Process Parameters by Plasma Assisted Diffusion Bonding of Dissimilar Alloys [J].
Ananthakumar, K. ;
Kumaran, S. .
EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 43 (01) :105-115
[13]   A New Group Decision Model Based on Grey-Intuitionistic Fuzzy-ELECTRE and VIKOR for Contractor Assessment Problem [J].
Hashemi, Hassan ;
Mousavi, Seyed Meysam ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Chalekaee, Alireza ;
Turskis, Zenonas .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (05)
[14]   A DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model with Loss Aversion for Contractor Selection [J].
Huang, Huixia ;
Zhou, Chi ;
Deng, Hepu .
MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (10)
[15]   Contractor Selection Model for Highway Projects Using Integrated Simulation and Analytic Network Process [J].
El-Abbasy, Mohammed S. ;
Zayed, Tarek ;
Ahmed, Marwa ;
Alzraiee, Hani ;
Abouhamad, Mona .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (07) :755-767
[16]   Developing a Hybrid Fuzzy Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Circular Contractor Selection [J].
Koc, Kerim ;
Ekmekcioglu, Omer ;
Isik, Zeynep .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 149 (10)
[17]   Porosity Prediction through Hydrogen Bonding in Covalent Organic Frameworks [J].
Karak, Suvendu ;
Kumar, Sushil ;
Pachfule, Pradip ;
Banerjee, Rahul .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 140 (15) :5138-5145
[18]   A Single Default Discrimination Model Based on the Selection of Multiple Single Models [J].
Mandour, Mohamed Abdelaziz ;
Chi, Guotai ;
Amran, Gehad Abdullah ;
Alsalman, Hussain .
IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 :166870-166884
[19]   Parametric Prediction Model Using Expert System and Fuzzy Harmonic System [J].
Bel, W. ;
Lopez De Luise, D. ;
Asmis, A. ;
Mansilla, D. .
SOFT COMPUTING APPLICATIONS, SOFA 2016, VOL 2, 2018, 634 :117-139
[20]   Fuzzy Time Series Prediction Model [J].
Garg, Bindu ;
Beg, M. M. Sufyan ;
Ansari, A. Q. ;
Imran, B. M. .
INFORMATION INTELLIGENCE, SYSTEMS, TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 141 :126-+