Contractor default prediction model for surety bonding

被引:5
|
作者
Awad, Adel [1 ]
Fayek, Aminah Robinson [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Hole Sch Construct Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Markin CNRL Nat Resources Engn Facil 1 050, Edmonton, AB T6G 2W2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Hole Sch Construct Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Markin CNRL Nat Resources Engn Facil 3 013, Edmonton, AB T6G 2W2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
construction; contractor default; expert systems; fuzzy logic; surety bonding; AGGREGATION;
D O I
10.1139/L2012-028
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Contractor default is one of the major risks that threaten a project's success in the construction industry. Previous studies have focused mainly on evaluation of the contractor's financial aspects to predict contractor default. There remains a need for a comprehensive model that has the ability to incorporate the evaluation of all the project aspects, project team, contractual risks, and project management evaluation criteria to predict the possibility of a contractor's default on a specific construction project. This paper presents a contractor default prediction model (CDPM) from the surety bonding perspective that incorporates these criteria and uses a fuzzy inference system for reasoning. The CDPM provides a more objective, structured, and comprehensive approach for contractor default prediction for surety practitioners, project owners, and for self-assessment by contractors to reduce the risk of contractor default. The multi-attribute utility function was used to develop a group consensus system (GCS) to aggregate the participating experts' opinions to build the CDPM. The accuracy of the GCS was found to be 91.1%. A novel approach for fuzzy rule base development is applied to develop the rule base for the CDPM. The CDPM was validated using 30 contractor default prediction cases, and the accuracy was found to be 86.5%.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1042
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaptive Learning of Contractor Default Prediction Model for Surety Bonding
    Awad, Adel
    Fayek, Aminah Robinson
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (06) : 694 - 704
  • [2] A decision support system for contractor prequalification for surety bonding
    Awad, Adel
    Fayek, Aminah Robinson
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 21 : 89 - 98
  • [3] An enforced support vector machine model for construction contractor default prediction
    Tserng, H. Ping
    Lin, Gwo-Fong
    Tsai, L. Ken
    Chen, Po-Cheng
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 20 (08) : 1242 - 1249
  • [4] A novel hybrid intelligent approach for contractor default status prediction
    Cheng, Min-Yuan
    Nhat-Duc Hoang
    Lirnanto, Lisayuri
    Wu, Yu-Wei
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 71 : 314 - 321
  • [5] Construction surety bonding
    Kangari, R
    Bakheet, M
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2001, 127 (03): : 232 - 238
  • [6] Predicting Construction Contractor Default with Barrier Option Model
    Tserng, H. Ping
    Liao, Hsien-Hsing
    Jaselskis, Edward J.
    Tsai, L. Ken
    Chen, Po-Cheng
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 138 (05) : 621 - 630
  • [7] Contractor lashes out at surety as projects go awry
    Barnes, Jonathan
    ENR (Engineering News-Record), 2012, 269 (16):
  • [8] Contractor That Overreaches Is Terminated For Default
    Loulakis, Michael C.
    McLaughlin, Lauren P.
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 87 (07): : 88 - 88
  • [9] PROCEDURES AND INSTRUMENTS UTILIZED TO PROTECT THE SURETY WHO FINANCES A CONTRACTOR
    SCHROEDER, GJ
    FORUM-AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, 1979, 14 (04): : 830 - 868
  • [10] SPECIAL STATUTES OF LIMITATION FOR ACTION AGAINST THE CONTRACTOR - A DEFENSE TO THE SURETY
    WITHERWAX, CH
    FORUM-AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, 1981, 16 (05): : 1057 - 1072