Strategic e-government development and the role of benchmarking

被引:11
作者
Kromidha, Endrit [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Holloway Univ London, Sch Management, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England
关键词
e-Government; International assistance; Benchmarking; Benchlearning; Neoinstitutionalism; Donor-benchmarker duality; USER ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY; INSTITUTIONALISM; TYPOLOGY; AID;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2012.04.006
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Developing information systems and e-government requires a lot of strategic and financial resources that developing countries often do not have. Facing such challenges, some countries are supported by international assistance and donors. This research contributes to explain how such assistance on the development of national information and communication technology (ICT) strategies and programs is related to e-government development. This comparative study of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, (Former Yugoslav Republic of) Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia takes a Rational Neoinstitutionalist perspective to look at longitudinal changes in these developing countries. Quantitative data such as the amount of foreign aid for national ICT strategies and the e-government index are combined with qualitative information from reports and documents. The research suggests that the effect of international assistance on e-government is generally positive in less developed countries. The analysis of benchmarking and benchlearning as e-government policy-making tools is another aim of this study, providing a critical discussion of their role and that of the donor-benchmarker duality. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 581
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   E-Government as a Development Strategy: The Case of Estonia [J].
Espinosa, Victor I. ;
Pino, Antonia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2025, 48 (02) :86-99
[22]   Benchmarking e-government policy within the e-Europe programme [J].
Wauters, Patrick .
ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 58 (05) :389-403
[23]   A conceptual model for the development of broadband and e-government [J].
Trkman, Peter ;
Turk, Tomaz .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2009, 26 (02) :416-424
[24]   Impact of Government Capacity and E-Government Performance on the Adoption of E-Government Services [J].
Mensah, Isaac Kofi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 43 (04) :303-311
[25]   Critically classifying: UK e-government website benchmarking and the recasting of the citizen as customer [J].
Mosse, Benjamin ;
Whitley, Edgar A. .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2009, 19 (02) :149-173
[26]   REINSTATING GREEK E-GOVERNANCE: A FRAMEWORK FOR E-GOVERNMENT BENCHMARKING, IMPROVEMENT AND GOVERNMENT POLICIES [J].
Kontogeorgis, Georgios ;
Varotsis, Nikolaos .
VOPROSY GOSUDARSTVENNOGO I MUNITSIPALNOGO UPRAVLENIYA-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ISSUES, 2021, (06) :103-127
[27]   Toward a Measurement Based E-Government Portals' Benchmarking Framework [J].
Fath-Allah, Abdoullah ;
Cheikhi, Laila ;
Al-Qutaish, Rafa E. ;
Idri, Ali .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES 2015 (MEDCT 2015), VOL 2, 2016, 381 :161-169
[28]   Local e-government benchmarking: limitations of comparative evaluation methods [J].
Batlle-Montserrat, Joan ;
Abadal, Ernest ;
Blat, Josep .
PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2011, 20 (03) :251-259
[29]   Benchmarking the e-government bulldozer: beyond measuring the tread marks [J].
Salem, Fadi .
MEASURING BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2007, 11 (04) :9-22
[30]   Understanding the drivers of the public value of e-government: Validation of a public value e-government adoption model [J].
Mensah, Isaac Kofi ;
Zeng, Guohua ;
Mwakapesa, Deborah Simon .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13