New evidence for strategic differences between static and dynamic search tasks: an individual observer analysis of eye movements

被引:4
作者
Dickinson, Christopher A. [1 ]
Zelinsky, Gregory J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Appalachian State Univ, Dept Psychol, Boone, NC 28608 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
visual search; eye movements; search strategies; memory in search; VISUAL-SEARCH; REJECTED DISTRACTORS; TARGET ECCENTRICITY; CONJUNCTION SEARCH; WORKING-MEMORY; ATTENTION; INHIBITION; RETURN; DISPLAYS; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00008
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two experiments are reported that further explore the processes underlying dynamic search. In Experiment 1, observers' oculomotor behavior was monitored while they searched for a randomly oriented T among oriented L distractors under static and dynamic viewing conditions. Despite similar search slopes, eye movements were less frequent and more spatially constrained under dynamic viewing relative to static, with misses also increasing more with target eccentricity in the dynamic condition. These patterns suggest that dynamic search involves a form of sit-and-wait strategy in which search is restricted to a small group of items surrounding fixation. To evaluate this interpretation, we developed a computational model of a sit-and-wait process hypothesized to underlie dynamic search. In Experiment 2 we tested this model by varying fixation position in the display and found that display positions optimized for a sit-and-wait strategy resulted in higher d' values relative to a less optimal location. We conclude that different strategies, and therefore underlying processes, are used to search static and dynamic displays.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Aks D.J., 2002, Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and the Life Sciences, V6, P1, DOI [10.1023/A:1012222601935, DOI 10.1023/A:1012222601935]
[2]   How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism [J].
Alvarez, George A. ;
Franconeri, Steven L. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2007, 7 (13)
[3]   Training older adults to search more effectively: Scanning strategy and visual search in dynamic displays [J].
Becic, Ensar ;
Boot, Walter R. ;
Kramer, Arthur F. .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2008, 23 (02) :461-466
[4]   Age-related differences in visual search in dynamic displays [J].
Becic, Ensar ;
Kramer, Arthur F. ;
Boot, Walter R. .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2007, 22 (01) :67-74
[5]   Explicit memory for rejected distractors during visual search [J].
Beck, Melissa R. ;
Peterson, Matthew S. ;
Boot, Walter R. ;
Vomela, Miroslava ;
Kramer, Arthur F. .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2006, 14 (02) :150-174
[6]   Detecting transient changes in dynamic displays: The more you look, the less you see [J].
Boot, Walter R. ;
Kramer, Arthur F. ;
Becic, Ensar ;
Wiegmann, Douglas A. ;
Kubose, Tate .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2006, 48 (04) :759-773
[7]   Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search [J].
Boot, WR ;
McCarley, JS ;
Kramer, AF ;
Peterson, MS .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2004, 11 (05) :854-861
[8]   THE ECCENTRICITY EFFECT - TARGET ECCENTRICITY AFFECTS PERFORMANCE ON CONJUNCTION SEARCHES [J].
CARRASCO, M ;
EVERT, DL ;
CHANG, I ;
KATZ, SM .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1995, 57 (08) :1241-1261
[9]   The effects of visual lobe training with easy and difficult targets on changes of visual lobe shape characteristics and visual search performance [J].
Chan, Alan H. S. ;
Chiu, Cathy H. Y. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2009, 39 (05) :851-859
[10]   Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? [J].
Chun, MM ;
Wolfe, JM .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 30 (01) :39-78