Evaluating Measurement Properties of the Adapted Interprofessional Collaboration Scale through Rasch Analysis

被引：2

作者：

Wieser, Heike ^{[1
]}

Mischo-Kelling, Maria ^{[2
]}

Cavada, Luisa ^{[3
]}

Lochner, Lukas ^{[4
]}

Fink, Verena ^{[5
]}

Naletto, Carla ^{[6
]}

Vittadello, Fabio ^{[7
]}

机构：

[1] Coll Hlth Care Profess, Res Unit, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy

[2] Univ Appl Sci Ravensburg Weingarten, Fac Social Work Hlth & Nursing, D-88250 Weingarten, Germany

[3] Coll Hlth Care Profess, Postgrad Courses Area, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy

[4] Coll Hlth Care Profess, Teaching Support Off, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy

[5] South Tyrolean Healthcare Trust, Nursing Directorate, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy

[6] Coll Hlth Care Profess, Dept Physiotherapy, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy

[7] Explora Res & Stat Anal, I-35010 Padua, Italy

来源：

HEALTHCARE | 2022年 / 10卷 / 10期

关键词：

interprofessional collaboration; Rasch analysis; IPC scale; nurses; instrument validation; VALIDATION;

D O I：

10.3390/healthcare10102007

中图分类号：

R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the German and Italian versions of the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (IPC scale) by applying a Rasch analysis. Data were gathered from 1182 nurses participating in a cross-sectional study in northern Italy. The scale demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92). Item polarity of all 13 items was positive, indicating good construct validity. However, revising one item would further improve the validity of the scale. Item stability was confirmed for work experience, workplace, age range, the language version, and gender. The analysis, applying a non-classical test theory, confirmed that the IPC scale is a valid and reliable instrument to measure interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians.

引用

页数：12

共 30 条

[1] [Anonymous], 2010, Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: taking action and generating evidence, P1
[2] Development and psychometric testing of a scale assessing the sharing of medical information and interprofessional communication: the CSI scale
Anthoine, Emmanuelle
Delmas, Christelle
Coutherut, Julie
Moret, Leila
[J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
[3] Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the IPECC-SET 9 item version
Axelsson, Malin
Kottorp, Anders
Carlson, Elisabeth
Gudmundsson, Petri
Kumlien, Christine
Jakobsson, Jenny
[J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2022, 36 (06) : 900 - 907
[4] Bond T.G., 2015, APPLYING RASCH MODEL, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315814698
[5] Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How?
Boone, William J.
[J]. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 2016, 15 (04):
[6] George D., 2010, SPSS WINDOWS STEP ST
[7] Granger C., 2008, Rasch Measurement Transactions, V21, P1122
[8] Development and validation of a tool to assess self-efficacy for competence in interprofessional collaborative practice
Hasnain, Memoona
Gruss, Valerie
Keehn, Mary
Peterson, Elizabeth
Valenta, Annette L.
Kottorp, Anders
[J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2017, 31 (02) : 255 - 262
[9] Validity and reliability of a multiple-group measurement scale for interprofessional collaboration
Kenaszchuk, Chris
Reeves, Scott
Nicholas, David
Zwarenstein, Merrick
[J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 10
[10] Kenneth D.R., 2010, IR APPL, V28, P1

← 1 2 3 →