共 50 条
Open repair versus thoracic endovascular aortic repair for treating traumatic aortic injury
被引:0
|作者:
Kim, Seon Hee
[1
]
Huh, Up
[2
]
Song, Seunghwan
[2
,5
]
Kim, Min Su
[2
]
Kim, Chang Won
[3
]
Jeon, Chang Ho
[3
]
Kwon, Hoon
[3
]
Wang, Il Jae
[4
]
机构:
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Trauma & Surg Crit Care,Sch Med, Pusan, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg,Sch Med, Pusan, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Radiol,Sch Med, Pusan, South Korea
[4] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Emergency Med,Sch Med, Pusan, South Korea
[5] Pusan Natl Univ, PusanNat Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg,Sch Med, 179 Gudeok Ro, Busan, 49241, South Korea
关键词:
Endovascular stent graft;
Medical management;
Multidisciplinary team approach and;
protocol;
Open repair;
Traumatic aortic injury;
STENT GRAFT;
MANAGEMENT;
RUPTURE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.11.0401015-9584
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background/objective: Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is rare and fatal. Treatment has evolved with advances in imaging and the emergence of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This study re-ports a single-center, 5-year experience of TEVAR and open repair for BTAI. Methods: Patients with BTAI treated at a level I trauma center from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed with patient charts and successive computed tomography angiography images. Patients were grouped according to treatment modality: open repair, TEVAR, or medical management, chosen based on patients' characteristics and injury severity. Groups were compared in terms of preoperative de-mographics, injury characteristics, operative variables, short-term, and long-term outcomes. Results: Forty-two patients were included in the study: 16 (38%) underwent open repair, 17 (40.4%) underwent TEVAR, seven (16.6%) were managed medically, and two (4.7%) died during triage. The me-dian age was 49 years (interquartile range [IQR], 38-57.5 years), and 92.5% were male; the median Injury Severity Score was 33 (IQR, 29-41). Overall mortality was 7.5%. The median hospital stay was 33 days (IQR, 19.5-58.5). Patients undergoing open repair were significantly younger (43 vs. 55 years; p = 0.002) and had a smaller aortic diameter (22.3 vs. 24.0 mm; p=<0.001) than those undergoing TEVAR. No BTAI-related late mortality or reintervention was observed during follow-ups. Conclusion: This study demonstrated excellent outcomes with multidisciplinary team efforts and appropriate application of treatment modality. TEVAR is ideal for older or severely injured patients; open repair is an important alternative for young patients or patients with unsuitable aortic anatomy. (c) 2021 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2224 / 2230
页数:7
相关论文