Open repair versus thoracic endovascular aortic repair for treating traumatic aortic injury

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Seon Hee [1 ]
Huh, Up [2 ]
Song, Seunghwan [2 ,5 ]
Kim, Min Su [2 ]
Kim, Chang Won [3 ]
Jeon, Chang Ho [3 ]
Kwon, Hoon [3 ]
Wang, Il Jae [4 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Trauma & Surg Crit Care,Sch Med, Pusan, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg,Sch Med, Pusan, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Radiol,Sch Med, Pusan, South Korea
[4] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Emergency Med,Sch Med, Pusan, South Korea
[5] Pusan Natl Univ, PusanNat Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg,Sch Med, 179 Gudeok Ro, Busan, 49241, South Korea
关键词
Endovascular stent graft; Medical management; Multidisciplinary team approach and; protocol; Open repair; Traumatic aortic injury; STENT GRAFT; MANAGEMENT; RUPTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.11.0401015-9584
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/objective: Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is rare and fatal. Treatment has evolved with advances in imaging and the emergence of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This study re-ports a single-center, 5-year experience of TEVAR and open repair for BTAI. Methods: Patients with BTAI treated at a level I trauma center from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed with patient charts and successive computed tomography angiography images. Patients were grouped according to treatment modality: open repair, TEVAR, or medical management, chosen based on patients' characteristics and injury severity. Groups were compared in terms of preoperative de-mographics, injury characteristics, operative variables, short-term, and long-term outcomes. Results: Forty-two patients were included in the study: 16 (38%) underwent open repair, 17 (40.4%) underwent TEVAR, seven (16.6%) were managed medically, and two (4.7%) died during triage. The me-dian age was 49 years (interquartile range [IQR], 38-57.5 years), and 92.5% were male; the median Injury Severity Score was 33 (IQR, 29-41). Overall mortality was 7.5%. The median hospital stay was 33 days (IQR, 19.5-58.5). Patients undergoing open repair were significantly younger (43 vs. 55 years; p = 0.002) and had a smaller aortic diameter (22.3 vs. 24.0 mm; p=<0.001) than those undergoing TEVAR. No BTAI-related late mortality or reintervention was observed during follow-ups. Conclusion: This study demonstrated excellent outcomes with multidisciplinary team efforts and appropriate application of treatment modality. TEVAR is ideal for older or severely injured patients; open repair is an important alternative for young patients or patients with unsuitable aortic anatomy. (c) 2021 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2224 / 2230
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] National Trends of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair versus Open Thoracic Aortic Repair in Pediatric Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury
    Hasjim, Bima J.
    Grigorian, Areg
    Barrios, Cristobal, Jr.
    Schubl, Sebastian
    Nahmias, Jeffry
    Gabriel, Viktor
    Spencer, Dean
    Donayre, Carlos
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 59 : 150 - 157
  • [2] Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) versus open surgery for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury
    Pang, Dominic
    Hildebrand, Diane
    Bachoo, Paul
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (02):
  • [3] Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) versus open surgery for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury
    Pang, Dominic
    Hildebrand, Diane
    Bachoo, Paul
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (09):
  • [4] National Trends of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Versus Open Repair in Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury
    Grigorian, Areg
    Spencer, Dean
    Donayre, Carlos
    Nahmias, Jeffry
    Schubl, Sebastian
    Gabriel, Viktor
    Barrios, Cristobal, Jr.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 52 : 72 - 78
  • [5] Current challenges in open versus endovascular repair of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm
    Harky, Amer
    Chan, Jeffrey Shi Kai
    Wong, Chris Ho Ming
    Francis, Chris
    Bashir, Mohamad
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 68 (05) : 1582 - 1592
  • [6] Outcome of endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical repair in traumatic thoracic aortic injury
    Ghoneim, Baker
    Hafez, Bassem A.
    Aboollo, Moustafa F.
    Karmota, Ahmed G.
    Elwan, Hussein O.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 26 (02): : 85 - 88
  • [7] Open vs endovascular repair of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries
    Rheaume, Pascal
    Chen, Jerry
    Casey, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 (03) : 763 - 769
  • [8] Thoracic Aortic Dilation after Endovascular Repair of Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury
    Tran, Kenneth
    Li, Ming
    Stern, Jordan R.
    Lee, Jason T.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 70 : 101 - 108
  • [9] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury: A Single-Center Initial Experience
    Shan, Jiang-gui
    Zhai, Xin-ming
    Liu, Ji-dong
    Yang, Wen-gang
    Xue, Song
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 32 : 104 - 110
  • [10] Aortic dilatation after endovascular repair of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries
    Forbes, Thomas L.
    Harris, Jeremy R.
    Lawlor, D. Kirk
    DeRose, Guy
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 52 (01) : 45 - 48