The grammar of accusative case in Kannada

被引:28
作者
Lidz, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Linguist, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/lan.2006.0054
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This article examines the distribution of accusative case morphology in Kannada, detailing the syntactic, semantic. and morphological factors that contribute to its occurrence. Accusative case morphology is optional on inanimate direct objects. When optional. its presence indicates a specific reading, which I argue is best modeled as a choice function The specific readings due to morphological form are distinct from specific readings that arise from syntactic position. Positional specificity is detectable only on morphologically noncasemarked object NPs. When the accusative case morpheme is obligatory, specificity effects are positional and not due to the presence of the morpheme. In this situation. additional morphology is required to achieve an inherently specific interpretation, suggesting a separation between morphological signals and meaning.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 32
页数:23
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy [J].
Aissen, J .
NATURAL LANGUAGE & LINGUISTIC THEORY, 2003, 21 (03) :435-483
[2]  
AMRITAVALLI R, 1998, GEN LING OLD WORLD G
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, AMORPHOUS MORPHOLOGY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, EXPERIENCER SUBJECTS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1986, WORD ORDER SYNTACTIC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1993, VIEW BUILDING
[7]  
ARAD M, 1999, MIT WORKING PAPERS L, V33, P1
[8]  
ARONOFF M, 1994, MORPHOLOGY BY ITSELF
[9]  
BAKER M, 1985, INCORPORATION
[10]  
BALTIN M, 1977, STUDIES LANGUAGE VAR, P30