Increased 3-gram cefazolin dosing for cesarean delivery prophylaxis in obese women

被引:61
作者
Swank, Morgan L. [1 ,2 ]
Wing, Deborah A. [1 ]
Nicolau, David P. [3 ]
McNulty, Jennifer A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, Orange, CA 92668 USA
[2] Miller Childrens & Womens Hosp, Long Beach, CA USA
[3] Hartford Hosp, Ctr Antiinfect Res & Dev, Hartford, CT 06115 USA
关键词
cefazolin; cesarean delivery; minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC); obesity; prophylaxis; SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.030
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine tissue concentrations of cefazolin after the administration of a 3-g prophylactic dose for cesarean delivery in obese women (body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m(2)) and to compare these data with data for historic control subjects who received 2-g doses. Acceptable coverage was defined as the ability to reach the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 8 mu g/mL for cefazolin. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a 2-phase investigation. The current phase is a prospective cohort study of the effects of obesity on tissue concentrations after prophylactic 3-g cefazolin doses at the time of cesarean delivery. Concentration data after 3-g were compared with data for historic control subjects who had received 2-g. Three grams of parenteral cefazolin was given 30-60 minutes before skin incision. Adipose samples were collected at both skin incision and closure. Cefazolin concentrations were determined with the use of a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. RESULTS: Twenty-eight obese women were enrolled in the current study; 29 women were enrolled in the historic cohort. BMI had a proportionally inverse relationship on antibiotic concentrations. An increase of the cefazolin dose dampened this effect and improved the probability of reaching the recommended MIC of >= 8 mu g/mL. Subjects with a BMI of 30-40 kg/m(2) had a median concentration of 6.5 mu g/g (interquartile range [IQR], 4.18-7.18) after receiving 2-g vs 22.4 mu g/g (IQR, 20.29-34.36) after receiving 3-g. Women with a BMI of > 40 kg/m(2) had a median concentration of 4.7 mu g/g (IQR, 3.11-4.97) and 9.6 mu g/g (IQR, 7.62-15.82) after receiving 2- and 3-g, respectively. With 2 g of cefazolin, only 20% of the cohort with a BMI of 30-40 kg/m(2) and none of the cohort with a BMI of > 40 kg/m(2) reached an MIC of >= 8 mu g/mL. With 3-g, all women with a BMI of 30-40 kg/m(2) reached target MIC values; 71% of the women with a BMI of > 40 kg/m(2) attained this cutoff. CONCLUSION: Higher adipose concentrations of cefazolin were observed after the administration of an increased prophylactic dose. This concentration-based pharmacology study supports the use of 3 g of cefazolin at the time of cesarean delivery in obese women. Normal and overweight women (BMI < 30 kg/m(2)) reach adequate cefazolin concentrations with the standard 2-g dosing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient
    Alanis, Mark C.
    Villers, Margaret S.
    Law, Tameeka L.
    Steadman, Elizabeth M.
    Robinson, Christopher J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (03) : 271.e1 - 271.e7
  • [2] Updated Recommendations for Control of Surgical Site Infections
    Alexander, J. Wesley
    Solomkin, Joseph S.
    Edwards, Michael J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 253 (06) : 1082 - 1093
  • [3] Cefazolin pharmacokinetics in maternal plasma and amniotic fluid during pregnancy
    Allegaert, Karel
    van Mieghem, Tim
    Verbesselt, Rene
    de Hoon, Jan
    Rayyan, Maissa
    Devlieger, Roland
    Deprest, Jan
    Anderson, Brian J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 200 (02) : 170.e1 - 170.e7
  • [4] Anaya Daniel A, 2006, Surg Infect (Larchmt), V7, P473, DOI 10.1089/sur.2006.7.473
  • [5] Anderson DJ, 2014, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V35, P605, DOI [10.1086/591064, 10.1086/676022]
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, Obstet Gynecol
  • [7] [Anonymous], OB OV
  • [8] [Anonymous], M100-S22: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing
  • [9] twenty-second informational supplement.
  • [10] [Anonymous], BIRTHS METHOD OF DEL