Comparison of deficit irrigation management strategies on root, plant growth and biomass productivity of silage maize

被引:72
作者
Gheysari, Mandi [1 ]
Sadeghi, Sayed-Hossein [2 ]
Loescher, Henry W. [3 ,4 ]
Amiri, Samia [1 ,5 ]
Zareian, Mohammad Javad [1 ]
Majidi, Mohammad M. [6 ]
Asgarinia, Parvaneh [6 ]
Payero, Jose O. [7 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Technol, Coll Agr, Dept Water Engn, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran
[2] Washington State Univ, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] NEON, Boulder, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Inst Alpine & Arctic Res INSTAAR, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[5] Oklahoma State Univ, Agr & Biosyst Engn Dept, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[6] Isfahan Univ Technol, Coll Agr, Dept Genet & Plant Breeding, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran
[7] Clemson Univ, Edisto Res & Educ Ctr, Blackville, SC USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Zea mays; Irrigation interval; Water use efficiency; Growth stage; Water stress; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; ZEA-MAYS L; DRIP IRRIGATION; YIELD RESPONSES; TROPICAL MAIZE; SHOOT GROWTH; CORN YIELD; CROP; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2016.12.014
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Knowledge about biomass partitioning of maize grown in arid and semi-arid climates is scarce and yet essential to select a robust and effective deficit irrigation management (DIM) strategy for these regions. The objectives of this study were to: i) investigate the effects of different levels of water application under two DIM strategies on the root and aboveground characteristics, the response factor to water stress (K-y) and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) of silage maize at different growth stages, and ii) determine the best DIM strategy that would maximize biomass productivity. Field pot experiments were conducted in Isfahan, Iran, during 2009 and 2010. The two DIM strategies were fixed irrigation interval-variable irrigation depth (M-1), and variable irrigation interval-fixed irrigation depth (M-2). Each DIM strategy was tested at four water-deficit levels, including: severe, moderate, mild, and a full-irrigation. In M-1, irrigation intervals were consistent for all irrigation treatments but Were varied over the growing season. Treatment effects were measured at the 10-leaf, 16-leaf, tasseling, milk, and silage harvest crop growth stages. There was significant effect of irrigation and growth stage on total aboveground biomass (TB), leaf area (LA), root biomass (RB), and root:shoot ratio (RSR) for both DIM strategies during the two years. For M-2, there was significant difference in TB, LA, RB, and RSR between all irrigation levels at all growth stages. TB production was on the average around 25% higher for M-1 compared to M-2, even though total applied irrigation water was only 6% higher for M-1. Comparing the two DIMs showed that RSR and K-y were both higher for M-2, indicating that the crop was more sensitive to this strategy. In conclusion, M-1 was selected as the best management practice since it had more favorable effects on improving the IWUE and also on the development of maize roots during the growing season. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 138
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条