Lithofacies classification and its controls on the pore structure distribution in Permian transitional shale in the northeastern Ordos Basin, China

被引:27
|
作者
Xue, Chunqi [1 ]
Wu, Jianguang [2 ]
Qiu, Longwei [1 ]
Zhong, Jianhua [1 ]
Zhang, Shouren [2 ]
Zhang, Bing [2 ]
Wu, Xiang [2 ]
Hao, Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Coll Geosci, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[2] China United Coalbed Methane, Beijing 100011, Peoples R China
关键词
Transitional shale; Lithofacies; Pore structure; Controlling factors; Ordos basin; METHANE ADSORPTION CAPACITY; MISSISSIPPIAN BARNETT SHALE; NATURAL-GAS ACCUMULATIONS; COAL-BEARING STRATA; ORGANIC-RICH SHALE; FORT-WORTH BASIN; SICHUAN BASIN; JIAOSHIBA AREA; FRACTAL CHARACTERISTICS; LONGMAXI SHALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107657
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Sea level changes more frequently during the deposition of transitional shale than marine shale, resulting in the strong heterogeneity and instability of the sedimentary environment and making transitional shale gas evaluation difficult. The appropriate identification and classification of transitional shale lithofacies types can improve evaluation of shale reservoirs and can provide the geological basis for the evaluation and potential of shale gas reservoirs during exploration and development. The lower Permian shale in the northeastern Ordos Basin is selected as the focus of this research. Based on X-ray diffraction (XRD), total organic content (TOC), vitrinite reflectance (R-o), nitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption, and argon ion polishing scanning electron microscopy (AIP-SEM) data, the lower Permian transitional shale in the study area is divided into silty mudstone and muddy siltstone lithofacies. On this basis, the differences in the organic geochemical characteristics, pore development characteristics and influencing factors of the shale reservoir in the two lithofacies are compared. The results show that the mean values of w(TOC) and w(Ro) in the muddy siltstone lithofacies are 1.9% and 1.0%, respectively. Siliceous minerals dominate the composition of the rock, and the main types of reservoir spaces are mineral matrix pores, including interparticle (interP) pores and intraparticle (intraP) pores related to inorganic minerals. Macropores and mesopores are the main components of the pore volume, and account for 40.8% and 49.8% of the total volume, respectively. The pore structure is mainly affected by the TOC and siliceous mineral contents. In the silty mudstone lithofacies, the average values of w(TOC) and w(Ro) are 2.4% and 1.2%, respectively. The clay mineral content is relatively high. The main types of reservoir spaces are organic pores and interP pores. Additionally, the pore volumes of macropores, mesopores and micropores are almost the same, accounting for 24.9%, 44.6% and 30.4% of the total pore volume, respectively. The pore structure is mainly affected by the organic matter content and clay mineral content.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Favorable lithofacies types and genesis of marine- continental transitional black shale: A case study of Permian Shanxi Formation in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin, NW China
    Wu J.
    Wang H.
    Shi Z.
    Wang Q.
    Zhao Q.
    Dong D.
    Li S.
    Liu D.
    Sun S.
    Qiu Z.
    Shiyou Kantan Yu Kaifa/Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48 (06): : 1137 - 1149
  • [32] Favorable lithofacies and pore characteristics of the Permian Longtan Formation shale in the southern Sichuan Basin
    Chen, Ya'na
    Yang, Kai
    Wu, Wei
    Yang, Yuran
    Yang, Xue
    Ma, Kai
    ENERGY GEOSCIENCE, 2023, 4 (03):
  • [33] The lithofacies and reservoir characteristics of the Upper Ordovician and Lower Silurian black shale in the Southern Sichuan Basin and its periphery, China
    Han, Chao
    Jiang, Zaixing
    Han, Mei
    Wu, Minghao
    Lin, Wen
    MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2016, 75 : 181 - 191
  • [34] Nanoscale pore structure heterogeneity and its quantitative characterization in Chang7 lacustrine shale of the southeastern Ordos Basin, China
    Shan, Changan
    Zhao, Weiwei
    Wang, Fengqin
    Zhang, Kun
    Feng, Zhao
    Guo, Liulinbo
    Ma, Xueli
    Liao, Tian
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 187 (187)
  • [35] Shale lithofacies controls on porosity and pore structure: An example from Ordovician Goldwyer Formation, Canning Basin, Western Australia
    Iqbal, Muhammad Atif
    Rezaee, Reza
    Smith, Gregory
    Ekundayo, Jamiu M.
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 89 (89)
  • [36] Reservoir characteristics and pore fluid evaluation of Shan 23 Submember transitional shale, eastern Ordos Basin, China: Insights from NMR experiments
    Cai, Guangyin
    Gu, Yifan
    Xiong, Xianyue
    Li, Xingtao
    Sun, Xiongwei
    Ni, Jia
    Jiang, Yuqiang
    Fu, Yonghong
    Ou, Fang
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [37] Compositional controls on pore-size distribution by nitrogen adsorption technique in the Lower Permian Shanxi Shales, Ordos Basin
    Yang, Chao
    Zhang, Jinchuan
    Han, Shuangbiao
    Wang, Xiangzeng
    Wang, Lin
    Yu, Wenwu
    Wang, Zhenguo
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 34 : 1369 - 1381
  • [38] Fractal analysis of pore structures in transitional shale gas reservoirs in the Linxing area, Ordos Basin
    Shi, Shuai
    He, Jinxian
    Zhang, Xiaoli
    Wu, Hongchen
    Yu, Ziqi
    Wang, Jian
    Yang, Tiantian
    Wang, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [39] Differential development characteristics of secondary pores and effects on pore structure and movable fluid distribution in tight gas sandstones in the lower Permian, northeastern Ordos Basin, China
    Wang, Ziyi
    Liu, Yancheng
    Lu, Shuangfang
    Lin, Liming
    Zhou, Nengwu
    Liu, Yang
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 224
  • [40] Influence of solvents on pore structure and methane adsorption capacity of lacustrine shales: An example from a Chang 7 shale sample in the Ordos Basin, China
    Cao, Yan
    Han, Hui
    Liu, Hou-wu
    Jia, Jian-chao
    Zhang, Wei
    Liu, Peng-wei
    Ding, Zhen-gang
    Chen, Shi-jia
    Lu, Jun-gang
    Gao, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 178 : 419 - 428