Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: The popularization of bibliometric assessment

被引:30
作者
Cabezas-Clavijo, A. [1 ]
Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Fac Comunicac & Documentac, Dept Informac & Comunicac, Granada, Spain
关键词
Research evaluation; Bibliometrics; h-index; Citation analysis; Periodicals; Databases; Bibliographic; Google Scholar; Google Scholar Metrics; Google Scholar Citations; Biomedicine; Health sciences; IMPACT FACTOR; SCIENCE; SCOPUS; WEB; LIMITATIONS; INDICATORS; ADVANTAGES; ARTICLES; SEARCHES; JOURNALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.medin.2013.01.008
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to review the features, benefits and limitations of the new scientific evaluation products derived from Google Scholar, such as Google Scholar Metrics and Google Scholar Citations, as well as the h-index, which is the standard bibliometric indicator adopted by these services. The study also outlines the potential of this new database as a source for studies in Biomedicine, and compares the h-index obtained by the most relevant journals and researchers in the field of intensive care medicine, based on data extracted from the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Results show that although the average h-index values in Google Scholar are almost 30% higher than those obtained in Web of Science, and about 15% higher than those collected by Scopus, there are no substantial changes in the rankings generated from one data source or the other. Despite some technical problems, it is concluded that Google Scholar is a valid tool for researchers in Health Sciences, both for purposes of information retrieval and for the computation of bibliometric indicators. (C) 2012 Elsevier Espana, S.L. and SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 354
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, 3 (04) :273-289
[2]  
Anders ME, 2010, RESP CARE, V55, P578
[4]   Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country [J].
Bordons, M ;
Fernández, MT ;
Gómez, I .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 53 (02) :195-206
[5]   A Hirsch-type index for journals [J].
Braun, Tibor ;
Glanzel, Wolfgang ;
Schubert, Andras .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 69 (01) :169-173
[6]  
Cabezas-Clavijo A., 2012, ANUARIO THINKEPI, V6, P147
[7]   The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level [J].
Costas, Rodrigo ;
Bordons, Maria .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (03) :193-203
[8]   A critical view of the h-index:: observations based on a practical application [J].
Costas, Rodrigo ;
Bordons, Maria .
PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2007, 16 (05) :427-432
[9]   Hirsch-index for countries based on essential science indicators data [J].
Csajbok, Edit ;
Berhidi, Anna ;
Vasas, Livia ;
Schubert, Andras .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, 73 (01) :91-117
[10]  
Delgado Lopez-Cozar E, 2010, PROCEDIMIENTOS HERRA