The influence of decision time on sensitivity for consequences, moral norms, and preferences for inaction: Time, moral judgments, and theCNImodel

被引:22
作者
Kroneisen, Meike [1 ,2 ]
Steghaus, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Koblenz Landau, Dept Psychol, Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Mannheim, Sch Social Sci, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
moral dilemma; moral judgment; response time; PROCESSING TREE MODELS; UTILITARIAN INCLINATIONS; PROCESS DISSOCIATION; BACKWARD CROSSTALK; DILEMMAS; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1002/bdm.2202
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
It is often discussed that moral judgments are either consistent with the principle of utilitarianism or with the principle of deontology. Utilitarianism is a moral principle stating that the right act is the one that produces the best overall outcome. Deontology represents an ethical position indicating that the morality of an action depends on the intrinsic nature of the action regardless of the consequences. Criticism on the structure of moral dilemmas includes the problem that these dilemmas confound norms and consequences. Recently, a multinomial model (the CNI model) was developed to disentangle and measure sensitivity to consequences (C), sensitivity to moral norms (N), and general preference for inaction versus action (I), respectively. In Experiment 1, we examined the influence of time pressure on moral judgments using the CNI model. We found that time pressure influenced moral dilemma judgments by decreasing participants' sensitivity for consequences. There were no significant effects of time pressure on participants' sensitivity to norms and general preference for inaction. Furthermore, in Experiment 2, we examined the link of reaction times to moral judgments more closely by fitting a hierarchical Bayesian version of the CNI model. Longer reaction times lead to an increase in parameterN, and there was no influence of reaction times on parameterCorI.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 153
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]   A caveat on the Savage-Dickey density ratio: The case of computing Bayes factors for regression parameters [J].
Heck, Daniel W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 72 (02) :316-333
[22]   TreeBUGS: An R package for hierarchical multinomial-processing-tree modeling [J].
Heck, Daniel W. ;
Arnold, Nina R. ;
Arnold, Denis .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (01) :264-284
[23]   Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance [J].
Hommel, B .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1998, 24 (05) :1368-1384
[24]   Applying processing trees in social psychology [J].
Huetter, Mandy ;
Klauer, Karl Christoph .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 27 (01) :116-159
[25]   Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited [J].
Inzlicht, Michael ;
Schmeichel, Brandon J. ;
Macrae, C. Neil .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (03) :127-133
[26]   What Is Ego Depletion? Toward a Mechanistic Revision of the Resource Model of Self-Control [J].
Inzlicht, Michael ;
Schmeichel, Brandon J. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 7 (05) :450-463
[27]   Identifying the Locus of Compatibility-Based Backward Crosstalk: Evidence From an Extended PRP Paradigm [J].
Janczyk, Markus ;
Renas, Sandra ;
Durst, Moritz .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2018, 44 (02) :261-276
[28]   Sequential Modulation of Backward Crosstalk and Task-Shielding in Dual-Tasking [J].
Janczyk, Markus .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2016, 42 (05) :631-647
[29]   Beyond Sacrificial Harm: A Two-Dimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology (vol 125, pg 131, 2018) [J].
Kahane, Guy ;
Everett, Jim A. C. ;
Earp, Brian D. ;
Caviola, Lucius ;
Faber, Nadira S. ;
Crockett, Molly J. ;
Savulescu, Julian .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2018, 125 (02) :164-164
[30]   Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment [J].
Kahane, Guy .
SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 10 (05) :551-560