The influence of decision time on sensitivity for consequences, moral norms, and preferences for inaction: Time, moral judgments, and theCNImodel

被引:22
作者
Kroneisen, Meike [1 ,2 ]
Steghaus, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Koblenz Landau, Dept Psychol, Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Mannheim, Sch Social Sci, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
moral dilemma; moral judgment; response time; PROCESSING TREE MODELS; UTILITARIAN INCLINATIONS; PROCESS DISSOCIATION; BACKWARD CROSSTALK; DILEMMAS; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1002/bdm.2202
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
It is often discussed that moral judgments are either consistent with the principle of utilitarianism or with the principle of deontology. Utilitarianism is a moral principle stating that the right act is the one that produces the best overall outcome. Deontology represents an ethical position indicating that the morality of an action depends on the intrinsic nature of the action regardless of the consequences. Criticism on the structure of moral dilemmas includes the problem that these dilemmas confound norms and consequences. Recently, a multinomial model (the CNI model) was developed to disentangle and measure sensitivity to consequences (C), sensitivity to moral norms (N), and general preference for inaction versus action (I), respectively. In Experiment 1, we examined the influence of time pressure on moral judgments using the CNI model. We found that time pressure influenced moral dilemma judgments by decreasing participants' sensitivity for consequences. There were no significant effects of time pressure on participants' sensitivity to norms and general preference for inaction. Furthermore, in Experiment 2, we examined the link of reaction times to moral judgments more closely by fitting a hierarchical Bayesian version of the CNI model. Longer reaction times lead to an increase in parameterN, and there was no influence of reaction times on parameterCorI.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 153
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   A meta-analysis of response-time tests of the sequential two-systems model of moral judgment [J].
Baron, Jonathan ;
Gurcay, Burcu .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2017, 45 (04) :566-575
[2]   Use of a Rasch model to predict response times to utilitarian moral dilemmas [J].
Baron, Jonathan ;
Guercay, Burcu ;
Moore, Adam B. ;
Starcke, Katrin .
SYNTHESE, 2012, 189 :693-703
[3]   Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling [J].
Batchelder, WH ;
Riefer, DM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1999, 6 (01) :57-86
[4]  
Bentham Jeremy, 1781, An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation
[5]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[6]   Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers [J].
Conway, Paul ;
Goldstein-Greenwood, Jacob ;
Polacek, David ;
Greene, Joshua D. .
COGNITION, 2018, 179 :241-265
[7]   Deontological and Utilitarian Inclinations in Moral Decision Making: A Process Dissociation Approach [J].
Conway, Paul ;
Gawronski, Bertram .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 104 (02) :216-235
[8]   The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm [J].
Cushman, Fiery ;
Young, Liane ;
Hauser, Marc .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (12) :1082-1089
[9]   Multinomial Processing Tree Models A Review of the Literature [J].
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Auer, Tina-Sarah ;
Hilbig, Benjamin E. ;
Assfalg, Andre ;
Moshagen, Morten ;
Nadarevic, Lena .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 217 (03) :108-124
[10]  
Foot P., 1967, OXF REV, V5, P5