Cost implications of self-management education intervention programmes in arthritis

被引:6
作者
Brady, Teresa J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Arthrit Program, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
来源
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY | 2012年 / 26卷 / 05期
关键词
Cost-effectiveness analyses; Self-management education; Self-management support; Arthritis Self-Management Program; Chronic Disease Self-Management Program; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; CHRONIC DISEASE; HEALTH-BENEFITS; PUBLIC-HEALTH; PRIMARY-CARE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES; SUPPORT; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.berh.2012.09.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The purpose of this review is to examine cost implications, including cost-effectiveness analyses, cost-savings calculated from health-care utilisation and intervention delivery costs of arthritis-related self-management education (SME) interventions. Methods: Literature searches, covering 1980-March 2012, using arthritis, self-management and cost-related terms, identified 487 articles; abstracts were reviewed to identify those with cost information. Results: Three formal cost-effectiveness analyses emerged; results were equivocal but analyses done from the societal perspective, including out-of-pocket and other indirect costs, were more promising. Eight studies of individual, group and telephone-delivered SME calculated cost-savings based on health-care utilisation changes. These studies had variable results but the costs-savings extrapolation methods are questionable. Meta-analyses of health-care utilisation changes in two specific SME interventions demonstrated only one significant result at 6 months, which did not persist at 12 months. Eleven studies reported intervention delivery costs ranging from $35 to $740 per participant; the variability is likely due to costing methods and differences in delivery mode. Conclusions: Economic analysis in arthritis-related SME is in its infancy; more robust economic evaluations are required to reach sound conclusions. The most common form of analysis used changes in health-care utilisation as a proxy for cost-savings: the results are less than compelling. However, other value metrics, including the value of SME as part of health systems' self-management support efforts, to population health (from improved self-efficacy, psychological well-being and physical activity), and to igniting patient activation, are all important to consider. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 625
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Telephone-Based Self-management of Osteoarthritis A Randomized Trial
    Allen, Kelli D.
    Oddone, Eugene Z.
    Coffman, Cynthia J.
    Datta, Santanu K.
    Juntilla, Karen A.
    Lindquist, Jennifer H.
    Walker, Tessa A.
    Weinberger, Morris
    Bosworth, Hayden B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 153 (09) : 570 - 579
  • [2] [Anonymous], STAND GUID NCQAS PAT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on the Crossing the Quality Chasm: next steps toward a new health care system. Report of a summit: the 1st Annual Crossing the Quality Chasm Summit-a focus on communities
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, EFFECTIVE CLIN PRACT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, HLTH PEOPL 2020
  • [6] Arthritis Foundation Center for Disease Control and Prevention., 2010, NAT PUBL HLTH AG OST
  • [7] Patient education for people with arthritis in rural communities: the UK experience
    Barlow, JH
    Williams, B
    Wright, CC
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2001, 44 (03) : 205 - 214
  • [8] 'Instilling the strength to fight the pain and get on with life': learning to become an arthritis self-manager through an adult education programme
    Barlow, JH
    Williams, B
    Wright, CC
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 1999, 14 (04) : 533 - 544
  • [9] Berktold J, 2012, ARTHRITIS CENT UNPUB
  • [10] Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care
    Bodenheimer, T
    Lorig, K
    Holman, H
    Grumbach, K
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (19): : 2469 - 2475