Maternal gate closing and gate opening in postdivorce families

被引:67
作者
Trinder, Liz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Geog Polit & Sociol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
gatekeeping; facilitation; visitation; divorce;
D O I
10.1177/0192513X08315362
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This study explores the processes by which custodial mothers can support and inhibit fathers' relationships following divorce and separation. It draws on qualitative interviews with resident mothers and nonresident fathers from 54 separated families, including 22 sets of former couples. The study found that mothers adopt a range of strategies, from proactive gate opening to gate closing, and that these strategies appear influential. Maternal perceptions of paternal competence and child welfare beliefs, parental relationship quality, and parental role bargains were strongly linked to different types of maternal gatekeeping. Informed by systems theory, the interviews of former couples suggest that gate work, whether gate opening or gate closing, can be a dynamic transactional process rather than a linear and unidirectional process running from mothers to fathers.
引用
收藏
页码:1298 / 1324
页数:27
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Fathering over time: What makes the difference? [J].
Aldous, J ;
Mulligan, GM ;
Bjarnason, T .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 1998, 60 (04) :809-820
[2]   Maternal gatekeeping: Mothers' beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work [J].
Allen, SM ;
Hawkins, AJ .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1999, 61 (01) :199-212
[3]  
Amato P., 2004, ROLE FATHER CHILD DE, V4th, P341
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, BASICS QUALITATIVE R
[5]  
[Anonymous], DIVIDING CHILD
[6]  
ARDITTI JA, 1995, MARRIAGE FAM REV, V20, P283, DOI DOI 10.1300/J002V20N01_
[7]  
Blackwell A., 2003, NONRESIDENT PARENTAL
[8]  
BRAVER SL, 1998, DIVORCED DADS
[9]  
Buchanan C. M., 1996, Adolescents after divorce
[10]   Paternal involvement with children: The influence of gender ideologies [J].
Bulanda, RE .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2004, 66 (01) :40-45