The impact of supply contracts on supply chain product-flow management

被引:4
作者
Amrani, Aicha [1 ]
Deschamps, Jean-Christophe [1 ]
Bourrieres, Jean-Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Bordeaux Univ, IMS Lab, CNRS 5218, Dept Prod Engn, F-33405 Talence, France
关键词
Production planning; Supply contract; Linear programming model; Simulation; Flexibility rate; Frozen horizon; Performance assessment; QUANTITY FLEXIBILITY; BUYERS PERSPECTIVE; DEMAND; COORDINATION; SIMULATION; REDUCTION; NETWORKS; CAPACITY; OPTIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmsy.2011.09.004
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
One of the performance issues faced by the supply chain (SC) is the competitive production and delivery of products to all partners of the SC. The supply contract linking the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) with its suppliers currently represents an important decision tool influencing the production and delivery of final products. The aim of this article is to investigate by simulation the sensitivity of the supply chain's performance to the variations of two main supply commitments negotiated by contract: flexibility rate and frozen horizon. Each partner belonging to the SC of the OEM performs its own production planning process. A generic analytical model is proposed and applied to simulate the decisional behaviour of each partner in planning its production activities. Contractual constraints (resulting from supply contracts) are formalised and incorporated into the model to allow the study of their impact. Experiments are carried out through a mobile phone SC case study confronted with market fluctuation. The performance of a partner and a SC is assessed via different indicators, mainly the cost and the reliability. The computational results address some managerial findings that are helpful in defining an interesting supply contract along the SC to achieve global performance. (C) 2011 The Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 266
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]  
GALASSO F, 2006, P 12 IFAC INT S INF, V3, P233
[22]  
Gerchak Y, 2004, PROD OPER MANAG, V13, P23, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2004.tb00142.x
[23]   A negotiation aid for fixed-quantity contracts with stochastic demand and production [J].
Grossman, TA ;
Rohleder, TR ;
Silver, EA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2000, 66 (01) :67-76
[24]   The impacts of sharing production information on supply chain dynamics: a review of the literature [J].
Huang, GQ ;
Lau, JSK ;
Mak, KL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2003, 41 (07) :1483-1517
[25]   Evaluation of traditional and quick-response retailing procedures by using a stochastic simulation model [J].
Hunter, NA ;
King, RE ;
Nuttle, HLW .
JOURNAL OF THE TEXTILE INSTITUTE, 1996, 87 (01) :42-55
[26]   Dynamic, customer-oriented improvement of supply networks [J].
Jammernegg, W ;
Kischka, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2005, 167 (02) :413-426
[27]   Warehouse space capacity and delivery time window considerations in dynamic lot-sizing for a simple supply chain [J].
Jaruphongsa, W ;
Çetinkaya, S ;
Lee, CY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2004, 92 (02) :169-180
[28]  
Kim B, 2010, J MANUFACTURING SYST
[29]  
Lambert D. M., 2004, Journal of Business Logistics, V25, P21, DOI 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2004.tb00180.x
[30]   Price protection in the personal computer industry [J].
Lee, HL ;
Padmanabhan, V ;
Taylor, TA ;
Whang, SJ .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (04) :467-482