Coping with stress: Public welfare supervisors doing their best

被引:16
作者
EreraWeatherley, PI
机构
[1] University of Washington, School of Social Work, JH-30, Seattle
关键词
supervisors; coping; stress; focus;
D O I
10.1177/001872679604900202
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study examines the coping mechanisms used by public welfare supervisors to deal with organizational stress. The findings, based on a qualitative study, indicate that the 14 supervisors examined employed two different coping categories which differ with regard to (a) their focus, (b) the source of stress, (c) the target person who is meant to benefit from them, and (d) the specific coping mechanisms. The first category is basically problem-focused, and serves the purpose of buffering subordinates from policy-ambiguity. The second category is essentially emotion-focused, and aims at buffering supervisors from stressful expectations of management and peers.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 170
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
[2]  
BANTZ CR, 1993, QUALITATIVE RES APPL, P107
[3]   QUALITATIVE RESEARCH AND THE STUDY OF LEADERSHIP [J].
BRYMAN, A ;
BRESNEN, M ;
BEARDSWORTH, A ;
KEIL, T .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1988, 41 (01) :13-30
[4]  
Burke R. J., 1980, CURRENT CONCERNS OCC
[6]   METHODS OF COPING WITH STRESS AT WORK - A CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS AND EMPIRICAL-STUDY OF MEASUREMENT ISSUES [J].
DEWE, PJ ;
GUEST, DE .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1990, 11 (02) :135-150
[7]   SOCIAL SUPPORT UNDER CONDITIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIGUITY [J].
ERERA, IP .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1992, 45 (03) :247-264
[8]   A META-ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTUAL CRITIQUE OF RESEARCH ON ROLE AMBIGUITY AND ROLE-CONFLICT IN WORK SETTINGS [J].
JACKSON, SE ;
SCHULER, RS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 36 (01) :16-78
[9]  
Kahn R. L., 1964, Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity
[10]   STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING - INFLUENCE PATTERNS IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE-SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS [J].
KENNY, GK ;
BUTLER, RJ ;
HICKSON, DJ ;
CRAY, D ;
MALLORY, GR ;
WILSON, DC .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1987, 40 (09) :613-631