The Relevance of the Judet and Letournel Acetabular Fracture Classification System in the Modern Era: A Review

被引:19
作者
Butler, Bennet A. [1 ]
Lawton, Cort D. [1 ]
Hashmi, Sohaib Z. [1 ]
Stover, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Judet; Letournel; acetabulum; acetabular fracture; classification; classification system; CT-BASED CLASSIFICATION; INJURY PATTERNS; OPEN REDUCTION; INTEROBSERVER; TOMOGRAPHY; FIXATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000001401
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Judet and Letournel acetabular fracture classification system, based on the idea of bicolumnar support of the acetabulum, was first described in a landmark article published in the 1960s. It has stood the test of time and continues to be the preferred method for describing acetabular fractures for the majority of orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Still, there have been attempts to modify or replace Letournel system since its introduction for a variety of reasons, chief among them a perceived inability of the classification system to account for a number of transitional fracture patterns and injury modifiers that may affect surgical decision making and patient outcomes. In this review, we present the literature related to the Judet and Letournel acetabular fracture classification system, over 50 years after its first formal description. We summarize its strengths, weaknesses, and its place in our current understanding of acetabular fractures and their recommended management.
引用
收藏
页码:S3 / S7
页数:5
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Classifications in Brief: Letournel Classification for Acetabular Fractures [J].
Alton, Timothy B. ;
Gee, Albert O. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (01) :35-38
[2]   Comparison of the Ilioinguinal Approach and the Anterior Intrapelvic Approaches for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of the Acetabulum [J].
Archdeacon, Michael T. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2015, 29 :S6-S9
[3]   Letournel classification for acetabular fractures -: Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability [J].
Beaulé, PE ;
Dorey, FJ ;
Matta, JM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (09) :1704-1709
[4]   A new type of acetabular fracture: "true" posterosuperior fracture, a case report [J].
Berton, C. ;
Bachour, F. ;
Migaud, H. ;
Pinoit, Y. ;
Laffargue, P. .
REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 2007, 93 (01) :93-97
[5]  
Borrelli Joseph Jr, 2008, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), V37, P455
[6]   Does semi-automatic bone-fragment segmentation improve the reproducibility of the Letournel acetabular fracture classification? [J].
Boudissa, M. ;
Orfeuvre, B. ;
Chabanas, M. ;
Tonetti, J. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (05) :633-638
[7]   Epidemiology and treatment of acetabular fractures in a level-1 trauma centre: Retrospective study of 414 patients over 10 years [J].
Boudissa, M. ;
Francony, F. ;
Kerschbaumer, G. ;
Ruatti, S. ;
Milaire, M. ;
Merloz, P. ;
Tonetti, J. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (03) :335-339
[8]   Acetabular fractures: Easier classification with a systematic approach [J].
Brandser, E ;
Marsh, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (05) :1217-1228
[9]  
Chmelova J, 2007, ACTA CHIR ORTHOP TR, V74, P210
[10]   Acetabular fracture assessment in four different pelvic trauma centers: have the Judet views become superfluous? [J].
Clarke-Jenssen, John ;
Ovre, Stein Arne ;
Roise, Olav ;
Madsen, Jan Erik .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2015, 135 (07) :913-918