Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the tibial-remnant preserving technique using a hamstring graft

被引:104
作者
Lee, BI [1 ]
Min, KD [1 ]
Choi, HS [1 ]
Kim, JB [1 ]
Kim, ST [1 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 657-58 Hannam Dong, Yougsan Ku, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; hamstring graft; remnant preservation;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2005.11.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
We propose that the tibial remnant of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is able to enhance the revascularization and cellular proliferation of the graft, to preserve proprioceptive function, and to be able to acquire anatomic placement of the graft without roof impingement. Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume that preserving the tibial remnant as much as possible as a source of reinnervation, if technically possible without causing impingement, would be of potential benefit to the patient. Our surgical technique was developed to maximize the preservation of the tibial remnant. The distally attached semitendinosus and gracilis tendons are harvested using the tendon stripper. After satisfactory placement of 2 guide pins convergently, a closed-end socket in the lateral femoral condyle is created using an adequately sized curved curette. For anatomic placement of the graft, the tibial tunnel should be positioned within the boundaries of the normal ACL tibial remnant. The reamer must be advanced very carefully to minimize injury to the residual remnant at the intra-articular margin of the tibial tunnel. Penetration should stop at the base of the stump. The folded grafts are then pulled intra-articularly through the tibial tunnel, the tibial remnant, and the femoral socket by pulling sutures under arthroscopic visualization. The ACL tibial remnant is compacted by the tendon passage. The graft is secured proximally by tying sutures in the lateral femoral condyle and distally at the tibia with double staples by a belt-buckle method. The advantages of our technique include maximal preservation of the tibial remnant, no roof impingement caused by intrasynovial anatomic placement of the graft, the simplicity of the procedure, the minimal need for hardware or special instruments, the economic benefit, and the potential prevention of tibial tunnel enlargement by preventing synovial fluid leakage.
引用
收藏
页码:CP2 / CP4
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Beker B., Schroder M., Ropke M., Starke C., Nebelung W., Structural properties of sutures used in anchoring multistranded hamstrings in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical study, Arthroscopy, 15, pp. 297-300, (1999)
  • [22] Spencer E.E., Chissell H.R., Span J.T., Feagin Jr. J.A., Behavior of sutures used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 4, pp. 84-88, (1996)
  • [23] Noyes F., Buttler D., Grood E., Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repair and reconstruction, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 66, pp. 344-352, (1984)
  • [24] Gerich T.G., Cassim A., Lattermann C., Lobenhoffer H.P., Pullout strength of tibial graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with a patellar tendon graft: Interference screw versus staple fixation in human knees, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 5, pp. 84-88, (1997)
  • [25] Letsch R., Comparative evaluation of different anchoring techniques for synthetic cruciate ligaments: A biomechanical and animal investigation, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2, pp. 107-117, (1994)
  • [26] Hoher J., Moller H.D., Fu F.H., Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Fact or fixation?, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 6, pp. 231-240, (1998)