Analysis of Pooled Phase III Efficacy Data for Delafloxacin in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

被引:15
作者
Giordano, Philip A. [1 ]
Pogue, Jason M. [2 ]
Cammarata, Sue [3 ]
机构
[1] Orlando Hlth, Dept Emergency Med, Orlando, FL USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Detroit Med Ctr, Div Infect Dis, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Melinta Therapeut, Lincolnshire, IL USA
关键词
delafloxacin; ABSSSI; skin; vancomycin; fluoroquinolone; SOFT-TISSUE INFECTIONS; COMPLICATED SKIN; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; ADULT PATIENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; MANAGEMENT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; DIAGNOSIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciz006
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Delafloxacin is an oral or intravenous (IV) antibiotic indicated for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), including both gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]) and gram-negative organisms. Chemically distinct from other quinolones, delafloxacin exhibits enhanced potency, particularly against gram-positive pathogens. The integration of efficacy data across the Phase III ABSSSI studies is presented here and allows for additional examination of results across subgroups. Methods Results of 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials of 1510 adults with ABSSSI were pooled for this analysis. Subjects in the vancomycin arm received 15 mg/kg, plus 1-2 g of aztreonam every 12 hours. Delafloxacin was dosed at 300 mg IV every 12 hours in Study 302; dosing in Study 303 was 300 mg IV every 12 hours for 3 days, with a mandatory, blinded switch to delafloxacin at 450 mg orally every 12 hours. The primary endpoint was objective response (OR), defined as a 20% reduction of lesion spread of erythema area at the primary infection site at 48 to 72 hours (2 hours), in the absence of clinical failure. Investigator-assessed response, based on the resolution of signs and symptoms at follow-up (FU; Day 14 1) and late follow-up (LFU; Day 21- 28), were secondary endpoints. Results In the intent-to-treat analysis set, the OR was 81.3% in the delafloxacin arm and 80.7% in the comparator arm (mean treatment difference 0.8%, 95% confidence interval -3.2% to 4.7). Results for OR in the defined subgroups showed delafloxacin to be comparable to vancomycin/aztreonam. Investigator-assessed success was similar at FU (84.7% versus 84.1%) and LFU (82.0% versus 81.7%). Delafloxacin was comparable to vancomycin/aztreonam in the eradication of MRSA, at 98.1% versus 98.0%, respectively, at FU. The frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events between the groups were similar. Conclusions Overall, IV/oral delafloxacin fixed-dose monotherapy was non-inferior to IV vancomycin/aztreonam combination therapy and was well tolerated in each Phase III study, as well as in the pooled analysis, regardless of endpoint or analysis population.
引用
收藏
页码:S223 / S232
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Oritavancin for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections [J].
Messina, Julia A. ;
Fowler, Vance G., Jr. ;
Corey, G. Ralph .
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2015, 16 (07) :1091-1098
[22]   Diabetes and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections [J].
Falcone, Marco ;
Meier, Juris J. ;
Marini, Maria Giulia ;
Caccialanza, Riccardo ;
Maria Aguado, Jose ;
Del Prato, Stefano ;
Menichetti, Francesco .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 174
[23]   Efficacy and safety of delafloxacin compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized study [J].
Pullman, J. ;
Gardovskis, J. ;
Farley, B. ;
Sun, E. ;
Quintas, M. ;
Lawrence, L. ;
Ling, R. ;
Cammarata, S. .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (12) :3471-3480
[24]   Tedizolid Phosphate for the Management of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Efficacy Summary [J].
O'Riordan, William ;
Green, Sinikka ;
Mehra, Purvi ;
De Anda, Carisa ;
Fang, Edward ;
Prokocimer, Philippe .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 58 :S43-S50
[25]   The safety of treatment options for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections [J].
Bassetti, Matteo ;
Peghin, Maddalena ;
Castaldo, Nadia ;
Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto .
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 18 (08) :635-650
[26]   The optimal duration of treatment for skin and soft tissue infections and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections [J].
Corcione, Silvia ;
De Rosa, Francesco Giuseppe .
CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 31 (02) :155-162
[27]   Current and emerging drugs for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: an update [J].
Kollipara, Ramya ;
Downing, Christopher ;
Lee, Michael ;
Guidry, Jacqueline ;
Curtis, Stephen ;
Tyring, Stephen .
EXPERT OPINION ON EMERGING DRUGS, 2014, 19 (03) :431-440
[28]   Analysis of the Phase 3 ESTABLISH Trials of Tedizolid versus Linezolid in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections [J].
Shorr, Andrew F. ;
Lodise, Thomas P. ;
Corey, G. Ralph ;
De Anda, Carisa ;
Fang, Edward ;
Das, Anita F. ;
Prokocimer, Philippe .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 59 (02) :864-871
[29]   Comparative efficacy of antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI): a systematic review and network meta-analysis [J].
Thom, H. ;
Thompson, J. C. ;
Scott, D. A. ;
Halfpenny, N. ;
Sulham, K. ;
Corey, G. R. .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2015, 31 (08) :1539-1551
[30]   In Vitro Activity of Delafloxacin and Microbiological Response against Fluoroquinolone-Susceptible and Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Two Phase 3 Studies of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections [J].
McCurdy, S. ;
Lawrence, L. ;
Quintas, M. ;
Woosley, L. ;
Flamm, R. ;
Tseng, C. ;
Cammarata, S. .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 61 (09)