Factors in the selection of a teleradiology provider in the United States

被引:7
作者
Hunter, Tim B. [1 ]
Krupinski, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Weinstein, Ronald S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Med Imaging, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Arizona Telemed Program, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
RADIOLOGY; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1177/1357633X13503428
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Commercial teleradiology is well established in the US. There are many factors to consider when engaging a teleradiology provider. One of the basic questions is what do you expect to gain from it? Do you want a final reading from an attending radiologist (known as a consultant radiologist in many countries) or would you be satisfied with a preliminary reading from a teleradiology provider and a final reading from your own in-house radiologist the following day? Do you simply require after-hours coverage or do you need to supplement the coverage provided by your own internal radiologists during normal working hours? Teleradiology is not without its drawbacks. It can add additional costs, particularly for after-hours coverage. Teleradiology rarely provides in-house coverage for procedures, and the interpreting radiologist may sometimes be difficult to contact for consultation. Choosing a teleradiology vendor requires due diligence. When the contracting entity defines its expectations well and chooses its teleradiology vendor with care, the end result will be satisfactory for all concerned, including the patients.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 359
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Variability in Radiology Practice in the United States: A Former Teleradiologist's Perspective [J].
Abramson, Richard G. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 263 (02) :318-322
[2]  
American College of Radiology, REP ACR TASK FORC IN
[3]   ACR-AAPM-SIIM Practice Guideline for Digital Radiography [J].
Andriole, Katherine P. ;
Ruckdeschel, Thomas G. ;
Flynn, Michael J. ;
Hangiandreou, Nicholas J. ;
Jones, A. Kyle ;
Krupinski, Elizabeth ;
Seibert, J. Anthony ;
Shepard, S. Jeff ;
Walz-Flannigan, Alisa ;
Mian, Tariq A. ;
Pollack, Matthew S. .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (01) :26-37
[4]   Teleradiology coming of age: Winners and losers [J].
Boland, Giles W. L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (05) :1161-1162
[5]  
Bradley William G Jr, 2007, J Am Coll Radiol, V4, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.04.009
[6]   Off-site teleradiology: The pros [J].
Bradley, William G., Jr. .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (02) :337-341
[7]  
Brant-Zawadzki Michael, 2006, J Am Coll Radiol, V3, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.10.009
[8]   Preventing Another Group From Displacing Your Practice: Perspectives From the 2010 AMCLC [J].
Harolds, Jay A. ;
Duszak, Richard, Jr. ;
Strax, Richard ;
Short, Brad ;
Kaye, Alan D. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 8 (02) :99-103
[9]  
Health Level Seven International, HL7
[10]  
Kaye Adam H, 2008, J Am Coll Radiol, V5, P748, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.01.009