Differences in Masticatory Function in Patients with Endodontically Treated Teeth and Single-implant-supported Prostheses: A Pilot Study

被引:24
作者
Woodmansey, Karl F. [1 ]
Ayik, Murat [1 ]
Buschang, Peter H. [2 ]
White, Cathy A. [1 ]
He, Jianing [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ Syst, Baylor Coll Dent, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Endodont, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ Syst, Baylor Coll Dent, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Orthodont, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
关键词
Bite force; endodontic treatment; implant; masticatory function; occlusal contact; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; FOOD; COMMINUTION; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Endodontic treatment and dental implants are both viable treatment options to restore a compromised dentition. How these treatments impact patients' ability to chew has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to compare various parameters of masticatory function in patients with endodontically treated teeth and single-implant supported prostheses. Fifty patients were included in this study. Twenty-five patients had mandibular molar root canals, and 25 had single implant-supported prostheses in the mandibular molar region. The natural tooth contralateral to the treated side served as the internal control. Maximum bite force, chewing efficiency, and areas of occlusal contact and near contact (ACNC) were recorded for each subject, along with a questionnaire to evaluate subjective chewing ability. When compared with contralateral controls, dental implants were found to have significantly lower maximum bite forces, reduced chewing efficiency, and smaller ACNC. Endodontically treated teeth were not statistically different than their contralateral controls. These results indicate that endodontically treated natural teeth may provide more effective occlusal contact during masticatory function compared with implant-supported restorations, leading to more efficient mastication. (J Endod 2009;35:10-14)
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 14
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [11] Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults
    Hatch, JP
    Shinkai, RSA
    Sakai, S
    Rugh, JD
    Paunovich, ED
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (07) : 641 - 648
  • [12] Heffernan M, 2003, QUINTESSENCE INT, V34, P558
  • [13] CHEWING EFFICIENCY AND STATE OF DENTITION - METHODOLOGIC STUDY
    HELKIMO, E
    CARLSSON, GE
    HELKIMO, M
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1978, 36 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [14] Normal masticatory performance in young adults and children
    Julien, KC
    Buschang, PH
    Throckmorton, GS
    Dechow, PC
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [15] The development of a diagnostic instrument for the measurement of mechanical allodynia
    Khan, Asma A.
    McCreary, Bryce
    Owatz, Christopher B.
    Schindler, William G.
    Schwartz, Scott A.
    Keiser, Karl
    Hargreaves, Kenneth M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2007, 33 (06) : 663 - 666
  • [16] LEPLEY CRB, 2008, RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIO
  • [17] A review of factors influencing treatment planning decisions of single-tooth implants versus preserving natural teeth with nonsurgical endodontic therapy
    Lqhal, Mian K.
    Kim, Syngcuk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2008, 34 (05) : 519 - 529
  • [18] OPTIMUM MOUTHFUL FOR FOOD COMMINUTION IN HUMAN MASTICATION
    LUCAS, PW
    LUKE, DA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 1984, 29 (03) : 205 - 210
  • [19] MANLY RS, 1951, J DENT RES, V30, P474
  • [20] COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MASTICATORY EFFICIENCY OF FIXED AND REMOVABLE RESTORATIONS REPLACING MANDIBULAR FIRST MOLARS
    NAGASAWA, T
    TSURU, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1973, 30 (03) : 263 - 273