Uncertain Precedent Circuit Court Responses to Supreme Court Plurality Opinions

被引:24
作者
Corley, Pamela C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
关键词
supreme court; circuit courts of appeals; plurality opinions; majority opinions; institutional legitimacy; UNITED-STATES COURTS; MODEL; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1177/1532673X08319951
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
To what extent do lower court judges follow Supreme Court plurality opinions? By examining treatments of Supreme Court cases from the 1976-1986 terms by the Circuit Courts of Appeals from 1976 to 2005, this article addresses the consequences of the Supreme Court's failure to reach a clear majority decision. I find evidence that lower courts are less likely to follow plurality opinions than majority opinions. These findings have implications regarding the authority of the Supreme Court, compliance, and institutional legitimacy.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 49
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P777
[2]  
[Anonymous], REP ATT GEN NEW LOOK
[3]  
[Anonymous], POLITICAL SCI SCI PO
[4]  
[Anonymous], SUPREME COURT DECISI
[5]  
BAUM L, 1978, JUSTICE SYST J, V3, P208
[6]  
Benesh SaraC., 2002, US COURT APPEALS LAW
[7]   Overruled: An event history analysis of lower court reaction to Supreme Court alteration of precedent [J].
Benesh, SC ;
Reddick, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2002, 64 (02) :534-550
[8]  
BERRY MM, 2007, 0806 CHAPM U LAW
[9]  
Brehm J.O., 1997, Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public
[10]  
Brenner Saul., 1995, Stare Indecisis: The Alteration of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court