The effect of urban innovation performance of smart city construction policies: Evaluate by using a multiple period difference-in-differences model

被引:153
作者
Guo, Qingbin [1 ]
Zhong, Jinrong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hainan Univ, Sch Econ, Haikou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Smart city; Urban innovation performance; Multiple period difference-in-differences model; Heterogeneity analysis; Policy evaluation; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; REGIONAL INNOVATION; CITIES; CHINA; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the setting of Digital China, the smart city pilot strategy has become a fundamental part of the intelligent upgrading of the urban development model. Exploring the influence of smart city pilot policies on urban innovation performance is critical for achieving high-quality economic development and creating an innovation-driven country. This study views the experimental smart city policy in China as a quasi-natural experiment and assesses the improved influence of smart city development on urban innovation performance by constructing a multiple period difference-in-differences (DID) model, then confirms it using a variety of robustness test methodologies. The results show that urban innovation performance benefits from the construction of smart cities, and the promotion effect is sustainable. The level of economic development and information infrastructure, as well as the financial innovation expenditure, have a beneficial effect in encouraging smart city construction innovation performance, while the degree of opening-up hinders the improvement of smart city urban innovation performance. In addition, it is also found that there is heterogeneity in the promotion effect of smart city building on urban innovation performance. The research of this paper provides useful enlightenment for better exerting the promotion effect of smart city building on urban innovation performance.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Acemoglu Daron., 2011, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited, P319
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CITY CULT SOC, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2017.06.004
[3]   Exploring innovation creation across rural and urban firms: Analysis of the National Survey of Business Competitiveness [J].
Aryal, Giri ;
Mann, John ;
Loveridge, Scott ;
Joshi, Satish .
JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2018, 7 (04) :357-376
[4]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[5]   Smart innovative cities: The impact of Smart City policies on urban innovation [J].
Caragliu, Andrea ;
Del Bo, Chiara F. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 142 :373-383
[6]   Urban density and the rate of invention [J].
Carlino, Gerald A. ;
Chatterjee, Satyajit ;
Hunt, Robert M. .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2007, 61 (03) :389-419
[7]   Does the pilot free trade zone policy attract the entering of foreign-invested enterprises? The evidence from China [J].
Chen, Hao ;
Yuan, Bo ;
Cui, Qi .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2021, 28 (14) :1162-1168
[8]   Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence [J].
Chetty, Raj ;
Looney, Adam ;
Kroft, Kory .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (04) :1145-1177
[9]   Transformation effect of resource-based cities based on PSM-DID model: An empirical analysis from China [J].
Fan, Fei ;
Zhang, Xuerong .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 91
[10]   Can regional collaborative innovation improve innovation efficiency? An empirical study of Chinese cities [J].
Fan, Fei ;
Lian, Huan ;
Wang, Song .
GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2020, 51 (01) :440-463