Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome - a prospective study with 101 cases

被引:82
作者
Sarlos, Dimitri [1 ]
Brandner, Sonja [1 ]
Kots, LaVonne [1 ]
Gygax, Nicolle [1 ]
Schaer, Gabriel [1 ]
机构
[1] Cantonal Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, CH-5001 Aarau, Switzerland
关键词
laparoscopic prolapse repair; laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; POP-Q; quality of life; sacrocolpopexy; vaginal vault prolapse repair;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-008-0657-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Our prospective study evaluates laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse focusing on perioperative data, objective anatomical results using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system and postoperative quality of life using the Kings Health questionnaire. One hundred one patients completed the study. Fifty five had laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy for uterine prolapse and 46 had laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy prolapse. Median follow-up was 12 months. The subjective cure rate was 93% the objective cure rate (no prolapse in any compartment) according to the International Continence Society classification of prolapse was 98%. The main site of objective recurrence (6%) was the anterior compartment. No apical recurrences and no vaginal mesh erosion occurred. Postoperatively overall quality of life and sexual quality showed significant improvement with less than 1% de-novo dyspareunia. The procedure is recommended for experienced laparoscopic surgeons because of severe intraoperative complications like bladder or rectal injuries.
引用
收藏
页码:1415 / 1422
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy: Is the posterior, recto-vaginal, mesh mandatory?
    Antiphon, P
    Elard, S
    Benyoussef, A
    Fofana, M
    Yiou, R
    Gettman, M
    Hoznek, A
    Vordos, D
    Chopin, DK
    Abbou, CC
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 45 (05) : 655 - 661
  • [2] Mesh augmentation during pelvic-floor reconstructive surgery: risks and benefits
    Baessler, Kaven
    Maher, Christopher F.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 18 (05) : 560 - 566
  • [3] Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation
    Benson, JT
    Lucente, V
    McClellan, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) : 1418 - 1421
  • [4] The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction
    Bump, RC
    Mattiasson, A
    Bo, K
    Brubaker, LP
    DeLancey, JOL
    Klarskov, P
    Shull, BL
    Smith, ARB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [5] Cheret A, 2004, GYNECOL SURG, V1, P31
  • [6] Cosson M, 2000, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), V29, P746
  • [7] Flynn Brian J, 2002, Curr Opin Urol, V12, P353, DOI 10.1097/00042307-200207000-00015
  • [8] Fox AD, 2000, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V107, P1371
  • [9] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    Gadonneix, P
    Ercoli, A
    Salet-Lizée, D
    Cotelle, O
    Bolner, B
    Van Den Akker, M
    Villet, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2004, 11 (01): : 29 - 35
  • [10] Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
    Higgs, PJ
    Chua, HL
    Smith, ARB
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (08) : 1134 - 1138