Examination of Differential Validity of MMPI-2-RF Scores by Gender and Ethnicity in Predicting Future Suicidal and Violent Behaviors in a Forensic Sample

被引:13
作者
Whitman, Megan R. [1 ]
Tarescavage, Anthony M. [1 ]
Glassmire, David M. [2 ]
Burchett, Danielle [3 ]
Sellbom, Martin [4 ]
机构
[1] John Carroll Univ, Dept Psychol, 1 John Carroll Blvd, University Hts, OH 44118 USA
[2] Patton State Hosp, Dept Psychol, Patton, CA USA
[3] Calif State Univ Monterey Bay, Dept Psychol, Monterey, CA USA
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
MMPI-2-RF; test bias; risk assessment; forensic assessment; AFRICAN-AMERICAN; RISK-ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1037/pas0000677
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Given the diversity of individuals who undergo psychological assessment, examining whether cultural bias exists in psychological assessment instruments (i.e., differential validity) is crucial. This issue occurs when a measure systematically over- or underpredicts a criterion across demographic groups or is associated with the criterion unequally across the groups. We tested the differential validity of a widely used psychological test, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF), as a function of gender (male, female) and ethnicity (Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic/Latino American) in large samples of forensic psychiatric inpatients. Regression models were estimated in a multigroup framework. The analyses yielded negligible to small statistical evidence of differential validity in MMPI-2-RF scores predicting the number of future suicidal behaviors and violent behaviors in the samples. This evidence supports use of the MMPI-2-RF as a generally unbiased instrument for predicting key criteria across genders and ethnicities in a forensic psychiatric population.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 409
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Reviewing suicide in native American communities:: Situating risk and protective factors within a transactional-ecological framework [J].
Alcantara, Carmela ;
Gone, Joseph P. .
DEATH STUDIES, 2007, 31 (05) :457-477
[2]   Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology [J].
不详 .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2013, 68 (01) :7-19
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DOI 10.1176/dsm10.1176/appi.books.9780890420249.dsm-iv-tr
[4]   A comparison of MMPI-2 validity in African American and Caucasian psychiatric inpatients [J].
Arbisi, PA ;
Ben-Porath, YS ;
McNulty, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2002, 14 (01) :3-15
[5]   A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists [J].
Archer, Robert P. ;
Buffington-Vollum, Jacqueline K. ;
Stredny, Rebecca Vauter ;
Handel, Richard W. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2006, 87 (01) :84-94
[6]  
Ben-Porath Y. S., 2011, MMPI 2 RF MANUAL AD
[7]   Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment - Technology, guidelines, and training [J].
Borum, R .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1996, 51 (09) :945-956
[8]  
Butcher J.N., 2001, MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring
[9]  
Cohen JW., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[10]   Suicide assessment in a prison environment - A proposed protocol [J].
Correia, KM .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (05) :581-599