SETTING THE WEIGHTS OF SUSTAINABILITY CRITERIA FOR THE APPRAISAL OF TRANSPORT PROJECTS

被引:22
作者
Bueno Cadena, Paola Carolina [1 ]
Vassallo Magro, Jose Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Madrid, Transport Res Ctr TRANSYT, Madrid, Spain
关键词
sustainable transport; multi-criteria analysis; decision making; criteria weighting; pairwise comparisons; REMBRANDT; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; ATTRIBUTE WEIGHTS; FRAMEWORK; INFRASTRUCTURE; AID; ELICITATION; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3846/16484142.2015.1086890
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Although the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) has made progress towards appraising and measuring the performance of smart and sustainable transport projects, it still has important issues that need to be addressed such as the problem associated with incomparable quantities, the inherent subjective qualitative assessment, the complexity of identifying impacts to be included and its measurement method, and the corresponding weights. The issue of trading-off different sustainability criteria is the main unresolved matter. This problem may lead to lack of accuracy in the decision making process. This paper presents a new methodology to set the weights of the sustainability criteria used in the MCDA in order to reduce subjectivity and imprecision. We suggest eliciting criteria weights based on both expert preferences and the importance that the sustainability criteria have in the geographical and social context where the project is developed. This novel methodology is applied to a real case study to quantify sustainable practices associated with the design and construction of a new roadway in Spain. The outcome demonstrates that the approach to the weighting problem has significance and general application in a multi-criteria evaluation process.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 306
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]   Indicators and framework for assessing sustainable infrastructure [J].
Dasgupta, S ;
Tam, EKL .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2005, 32 (01) :30-44
[12]  
Friesz T. L, 1980, J TRANSPORTATION RES, V751, P38
[13]   Multicriteria framework to aid comparison of roadway improvement projects [J].
Frohwein, HI ;
Lambert, JH ;
Haimes, YY ;
Schiff, LA .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 1999, 125 (03) :224-230
[14]   Multicriteria decisions on interdependent infrastructure transportation projects using an evolutionary-based framework [J].
Gaytan Iniestra, Juan ;
Garcia Gutierrez, Javier .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2009, 9 (02) :512-526
[15]   Sustainable development indicators for major infrastructure projects [J].
Gilmour, Daniel ;
Blackwood, David ;
Banks, Les ;
Wilson, Fergus .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, 2011, 164 (01) :15-24
[17]   Combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis to prioritise a national road infrastructure programme [J].
Guehnemann, Astrid ;
Laird, James J. ;
Pearman, Alan D. .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2012, 23 :15-24
[18]   A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE ELICITATION OF ATTRIBUTE WEIGHTS - STRUCTURAL MODELING, PROCESS TRACING, AND SELF-REPORTS [J].
HARTE, JM ;
KOELE, P .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 64 (01) :49-64
[19]   Building public confidence in energy planning: a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas [J].
Hobbs, BF ;
Horn, GTF .
ENERGY POLICY, 1997, 25 (03) :357-375
[20]   Cost-benefit analysis according to Sen: An application in the evaluation of transport infrastructures in France [J].
Hyard, Alexandra .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (04) :707-719