Classification of breast mass lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging by a computer-assisted diagnosis system based on quantitative analysis

被引:7
作者
Yin, Jiandong [1 ]
Yang, Jiawen [1 ]
Jiang, Zejun [2 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Shengjing Hosp, Dept Radiol, 36 Sanhao St, Shenyang 110003, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ, Sino Dutch Biomed & Informat Engn Sch, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; quantitative parameter; receiver operating characteristic; semi-automatic segmentation; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; AIDED DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; MRI; CHEMOTHERAPY; ACCURACY; BENIGN; TIME; CAD;
D O I
10.3892/ol.2019.9916
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the current study was to develop a semi-automatic and quantitative method for the analysis of a time-intensity curve (TIC) from breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. The performance of the proposed method, based on the level set segmentation algorithm, was evaluated by comparison with the traditional method. In the traditional method, the lesion area is delineated manually and the corresponding mean TIC is classified subjectively as one of three washout patterns. In addition, only one quantitative parameter, the maximum slope of increase (MSI), is calculated. In the proposed method, the lesion region was determined semi-automatically and the corresponding mean TIC was categorized quantitatively. In addition to MSI, a number of quantitative parameters were derived from the mean TIC and lesion area, including signal intensity slope (SIslope), initial percentage of enhancement (E-initial), percentage of peak enhancement (E-peak), early signal enhancement ratio (ESER) and second enhancement percentage (SEP). Wilcoxon signed-rank test and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed for statistical analysis. For TIC categorization the accuracy was 61.54% for the traditional method and 82.05% for the proposed method. Using the proposed method, mean curve accuracies were 84.0% for SIslope, 66.7% for MSI, 66.0% for E-initial, 66.0% for E-peak, 68.0% for ESER and 44.9% for SEP. In the lesion region, the accuracies for the aforementioned parameters were 80.8, 65.4, 66.7, 62.2, 69.2 and 57.1%, respectively. Accuracy of the MSI value derived from the traditional method was 63.4%. Compared with the traditional method, the proposed semi-automatic method in the current study may provide results with a higher accuracy to differentiate benign and malignant lesions. Therefore, the proposed method should be considered as a supplementary tool for the diagnosis of breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:2623 / 2630
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Early assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by semi-quantitative analysis of high-temporal resolution DCE-MRI: Preliminary results [J].
Abramson, Richard G. ;
Li, Xia ;
Hoyt, Tamarya Lea ;
Su, Pei-Fang ;
Arlinghaus, Lori R. ;
Wilson, Kevin J. ;
Abramson, Vandana G. ;
Chakravarthy, A. Bapsi ;
Yankeelov, Thomas E. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 31 (09) :1457-1464
[2]   Application of Computer-aided Diagnosis (CAD) in MR-Mammography (MRM): Do We Really Need Whole Lesion Time Curve Distribution Analysis? [J].
Baltzer, Pascal Andreas Thomas ;
Renz, Diane M. ;
Kullnig, Petra E. ;
Gajda, Mieczyslaw ;
Camara, Oumar ;
Kaiser, Werner A. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (04) :435-442
[3]   Inter- and intraobserver variability in the evaluation of dynamic breast cancer MRI [J].
Beresford, Mark J. ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Taylor, N. Jane ;
Ah-See, Mei-Lin ;
Stirling, J. James ;
Makris, Andreas ;
d'Arcy, James A. ;
Collins, David J. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 24 (06) :1316-1325
[4]   Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy [J].
Bluemke, DA ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Chen, MH ;
DeAngelis, GA ;
DeBruhl, N ;
Harms, S ;
Heywang-Köbrunner, SH ;
Hylton, N ;
Kuhl, CK ;
Lehman, C ;
Pisano, ED ;
Causer, P ;
Schnitt, SJ ;
Smazal, SF ;
Stelling, CB ;
Weatherall, PT ;
Schnall, MD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (22) :2735-2742
[5]   Response to neoadjuvant treatment of invasive ductal breast carcinomas including outcome evaluation: MRI analysis by an automatic CAD system in comparison to visual evaluation [J].
Boettcher, Joachim ;
Renz, Diane M. ;
Zahm, Dirk-Michael ;
Pfeil, Alexander ;
Fallenberg, Eva M. ;
Streitparth, Florian ;
Maurer, Martin H. ;
Hamm, Bernd ;
Engelken, Florian J. .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2014, 53 (06) :759-768
[6]   Long-Term Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Screening Mammography [J].
Brodersen, John ;
Siersma, Volkert Dirk .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 11 (02) :106-115
[7]   Classification of breast mass lesions using model-based analysis of the characteristic kinetic curve derived from fuzzy c-means clustering [J].
Chang, Yeun-Chung ;
Huang, Yan-Hao ;
Huang, Chiun-Sheng ;
Chang, Pei-Kang ;
Chen, Jeon-Hor ;
Chang, Ruey-Feng .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 20 (03) :312-322
[8]   Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of residual ductal carcinoma in situ following preoperative chemotherapy in breast cancer patients [J].
Choi, Hei Kyung ;
Cho, Nariya ;
Moon, Woo Kyung ;
Im, Seock-Ah ;
Han, Wonshik ;
Noh, Dong-Young .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (04) :737-743
[9]   Accuracy of Clinical Examination, Digital Mammogram, Ultrasound, and MRI in Determining Postneoadjuvant Pathologic Tumor Response in Operable Breast Cancer Patients [J].
Croshaw, Randal ;
Shapiro-Wright, Hilary ;
Svensson, Erik ;
Erb, Kathleen ;
Julian, Thomas .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (11) :3160-3163
[10]   3-T Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: Pharmacokinetic Parameters Versus Conventional Kinetic Curve Analysis [J].
El Khouli, Riham H. ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Kamel, Ihab R. ;
Jacobs, Michael A. ;
Bluemke, David A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (06) :1498-1505