Efficient multitasking: parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks

被引:142
作者
Fischer, Rico [1 ]
Plessow, Franziska [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Psychol, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Berenson Allen Ctr Noninvas Brain Stimulat,Beth I, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
multitasking; dual-tasking; crosstalk; psychological refractory period (PRP); cognitive control; functional bottleneck; bottleneck; parallel versus serial processing; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; RESPONSE-SELECTION BOTTLENECK; IMPROVING FLUID INTELLIGENCE; DUAL-TASK; COGNITIVE CONTROL; WORKING-MEMORY; OVERLAPPING TASKS; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; POSITIVE AFFECT; CENTRAL INTERFERENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01366
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the context of performance optimizations in multitasking, a central debate has unfolded in multitasking research around whether cognitive processes related to different tasks proceed only sequentially (one at a time), or can operate in parallel (simultaneously). This review features a discussion of theoretical considerations and empirical evidence regarding parallel versus serial task processing in multitasking. In addition, we highlight how methodological differences and theoretical conceptions determine the extent to which parallel processing in multitasking can be detected, to guide their employment in future research. Parallel and serial processing of multiple tasks are not mutually exclusive. Therefore, questions focusing exclusively on either task-processing mode are too simplified. We review empirical evidence and demonstrate that shifting between more parallel and more serial task processing critically depends on the conditions under which multiple tasks are performed. We conclude that efficient multitasking is reflected by the ability of individuals to adjust multitasking performance to environmental demands by flexibly shifting between different processing strategies of multiple task-component scheduling.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
Allport D.A., 1980, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, P112
[2]   DIVISION OF ATTENTION - DISPROOF OF SINGLE CHANNEL HYPOTHESIS [J].
ALLPORT, DA ;
ANTONIS, B ;
REYNOLDS, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 24 (MAY) :225-&
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1975, Attention and performance
[5]   Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis [J].
Au, Jacky ;
Sheehan, Ellen ;
Tsai, Nancy ;
Duncan, Greg J. ;
Buschkuehl, Martin ;
Jaeggi, Susanne M. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (02) :366-377
[6]   Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks [J].
Beste, Christian ;
Yildiz, Ali ;
Meissner, Tobias W. ;
Wolf, Oliver T. .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 252 :260-265
[7]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[8]   The Source of Execution-Related Dual-Task Interference: Motor Bottleneck or Response Monitoring? [J].
Bratzke, Daniel ;
Rolke, Bettina ;
Ulrich, Rolf .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2009, 35 (05) :1413-1426
[9]  
Broadbent DE., 1958, Perception and Communication
[10]   Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration [J].
Cohen, Jonathan D. ;
McClure, Samuel M. ;
Yu, Angela J. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 362 (1481) :933-942