Cross-cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties of an Italian Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)

被引:34
作者
Cacchio, Angelo [1 ]
Paoloni, Marco [2 ]
Griffin, Sharon H. [3 ]
Rosa, Francesco [4 ,5 ]
Properzi, Gianfranco [1 ]
Padua, Luca [6 ,7 ]
Padua, Roberto [7 ]
Carnelli, Franco [5 ]
Calvisi, Vittorio [4 ]
Santilli, Valter [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aquila, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Sci Phys & Rehabil Med, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Sch Med, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Ctr 3M, Fowler Kennedy Sport Med Clin, London, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Aquila, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Sci, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
[5] IRCCS Multimed, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Inst Neurol, Dept Neurosci, Rome, Italy
[7] Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus Fdn, Milan, Italy
关键词
outcome measures; shoulder dislocation; shoulder questionnaire; HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; ANTERIOR DISLOCATION; BACK-PAIN; RESPONSIVENESS; VALIDATION; SF-36; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.2012.3827
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
STUDY DESIGN: Clinical measurement study. OBJECTIVES: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) into Italian, and to evaluate its measurement properties in patients with shoulder instability secondary to a first-time traumatic anterior dislocation. BACKGROUND: The WOSI was developed for English-speaking patients. To date, no Italian version of the WOSI exists. METHODS: The WOSI was cross-culturally adapted to Italian according to established guidelines. Sixty-four (16 women, 48 men) patients with unilateral shoulder anterior instability were prospectively recruited for the purposes of this study. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the WOSI were evaluated. RESULTS: The Italian version of the WOSI showed a high degree of internal consistency, with a Cronbach alpha of .93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91, 0.96). The test-retest reliability was high for both short-term (3 days, 64 patients) and medium-term (14 weeks, 20 patients) test-retest, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.97) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.95), respectively. The WOSI was more closely correlated to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire than to the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (r = 0.794 and 0.113, respectively). The receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis revealed that the WOSI was more responsive than the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (P =. 03), with an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.97) for the WOSI and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.88) for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The Italian version of the WOSI is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool that can be used to measure function in Italian-speaking patients with shoulder instability due to a first-time traumatic anterior dislocation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(6):559-567, Epub 8 March 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3827
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 567
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[2]   Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research [J].
Andresen, EM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S15-S20
[3]   The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: Translation, validation and norming [J].
Apolone, G ;
Mosconi, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1025-1036
[4]  
Beaton D E, 2001, J Hand Ther, V14, P128
[5]   Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Boers, M ;
Wells, GA .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) :109-114
[6]   Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3192-3199
[7]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[8]   Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments [J].
Beurskens, AJHM ;
deVet, HCW ;
Koke, AJA .
PAIN, 1996, 65 (01) :71-76
[9]   Cronbach's alpha [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7080) :572-572
[10]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond