Multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision making aided by numerical method: Framework and a case study of Malaysia and South Africa

被引:14
作者
Ridha, Hussein Mohammed [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hizam, Hashim [1 ,2 ]
Mirjalili, Seyedali [4 ,5 ]
Othman, Mohammad Lutfi [1 ,2 ]
Ya'acob, Mohammad Effendy [2 ,6 ]
Ahmadipour, Masoud [7 ]
Ismaeel, Nooruldeen Q. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
[2] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Engn, Adv Lightning Power & Energy Res ALPER, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
[3] Univ Al Mustansiriyah, Dept Comp Engn, Baghdad 10001, Iraq
[4] Torrens Univ Australia, Ctr Artificial Intelligence Res & Optimizat, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
[5] Yonsei Univ, Yonsei Frontier Lab, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Engn, Dept Proc & Food Engn, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[7] Univ Teknol MARA, Coll Engn, Sch Elect Engn, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
[8] Ibn Sina Univ Med &Pharmaceut Sci, Baghdad, Iraq
关键词
Hybrid renewable energy system; PV; Wind; Multi-objective optimization; Multi-criteria decision making; ENERGY-STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES; WIND-BATTERY SYSTEM; HYBRID; PV; ELECTRIFICATION; VIKOR; SIMULATION; GENERATION; ALGORITHM; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116468
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a new optimum design for an off-grid hybrid solar photovoltaic (PV), wind turbine (WT), and battery storage system for power isolated dwellings in Malaysia and South Africa. Selecting a desirable design of the WT/PV/Battery system among a wide variety of configurations, particularly at a favorable level of reliability, lowering the total cost, and reducing the surplus energy, remains a challenging task. The procedure of this work is summarized as follows: First, the parameter of the three diode PV model is optimally extracted from datasheet information to forecast the output power of the Yingli PV module. Then, the upper and lower variables bounds of the WT/PV/Battery system are intuitively determined. Afterward, the numerical method is employed to identify every possible configurations inside the design space. The non-dominated multi-objective principle is then established to generate optimal sets of Pareto front solutions. Finally, an integration of the best worst method, technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution, and group decision making technique are employed to weight the objectives with complete consistency ratios and rank the optimal designs based on practical judgments. The performance results showed that the optimal designs are comprised of 1 WTs, 105 PV modules (21 in series and 5 in parallel), and 69 storage batteries with zero loss of load probability (LLP), 60185.47 ($) of life cycle cost (LCC), and 13548017.77 KWh of excess energy for Malaysian scenario. While the optimum configuration of the South African case study consists of 16 WTs, 80 PV modules (20 in series and 4 in parallel), and 69 storage batteries with a favorable LLP values of 0.00068, 59180.15 ($) of LCC, and 19174160.54 ($) of excess energy, respectively. It can be concluded that the proposed methodology for finding appropriate size of the WT/PV/Battery system is capable of operating with extremely confident dependability while minimizing the overall cost of the system and minimizing the surplus energy.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Multi-Criteria Website Optimization Using Multi-Objective ACO [J].
Dilip, Kumar ;
Kumar, T. V. Vijay .
2015 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY, INFOCOM TECHNOLOGIES AND OPTIMIZATION (ICRITO) (TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS), 2015,
[22]   Multi-Objective Optimization of High-Power Microwave Sources Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Multi-Objective Micro-Genetic Algorithm [J].
Yang, Wenjin ;
Li, Yongdong ;
Wang, Hongguang ;
Jiang, Ming ;
Cao, Meng ;
Liu, Chunliang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 2023, 70 (07) :3892-3898
[23]   A DECISION SUPPORT MODEL FOR MITIGATING SUPPLY CHAIN RISKS BASED ON A MODIFIED FMEA, MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH [J].
Kayouh, Nabil ;
Dkhissi, Btissam .
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2024, 32 (01) :87-102
[24]   A multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation using multi-objective optimization and fuzzy approach [J].
Liaqait, Raja Awais ;
Warsi, Salman Sagheer ;
Agha, Mujtaba Hassan ;
Zahid, Taiba ;
Becker, Till .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 54 (06) :928-948
[25]   Multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision-making methods for optimal design of standalone photovoltaic system: A comprehensive review [J].
Ridha, Hussein Mohammed ;
Gomes, Chandima ;
Hizam, Hashim ;
Ahmadipour, Masoud ;
Heidari, Ali Asghar ;
Chen, Huiling .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 135
[26]   Urban bus network of priority lanes: A combined multi-objective, multi-criteria and group decision-making approach [J].
Hadas, Yuval ;
Nahum, Oren E. .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2016, 52 :186-196
[27]   The improved multi-criteria decision-making model for multi-objective operation in a complex reservoir system [J].
Yang, Zhe ;
Yang, Kan ;
Wang, Yufeng ;
Su, Lyuwen ;
Hu, Hu .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2019, 21 (05) :851-874
[28]   A hybrid decision making aided framework for multi-criteria decision making with R-numbers and preference models [J].
Zhao, Qian ;
Ju, Yanbing ;
Dong, Peiwu ;
Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D. R. .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 111
[29]   Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy [J].
Breedveld, Sebastiaan ;
Craft, David ;
van Haveren, Rens ;
Heijmen, Ben .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 277 (01) :1-19
[30]   A multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria evaluation integrated framework for distributed energy system optimal planning [J].
Jing, Rui ;
Zhu, Xingyi ;
Zhu, Zhiyi ;
Wang, Wei ;
Meng, Chao ;
Shah, Nilay ;
Li, Ning ;
Zhao, Yingru .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 166 :445-462