Applications of Machine Learning in Real-Life Digital Health Interventions: Review of the Literature

被引:146
作者
Triantafyllidis, Andreas K. [1 ,2 ]
Tsanas, Athanasios [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Res & Technol Hellas, Inst Informat Technol, 6th Km Charilaou Thermi Rd, GR-57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Med, Lab Comp Med Informat & Biomed Imaging Technol, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Med, Usher Inst Populat Hlth Sci & Informat, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Oxford, Math Inst, Oxford, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国惠康基金; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
machine learning; data mining; artificial intelligence; digital health; review; telemedicine; DIABETES PREVENTION; PREDICTION; DISEASE; PATIENT; SYSTEM; IMPACT; FUTURE;
D O I
10.2196/12286
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Machine learning has attracted considerable research interest toward developing smart digital health interventions. These interventions have the potential to revolutionize health care and lead to substantial outcomes for patients and medical professionals. Objective: Our objective was to review the literature on applications of machine learning in real-life digital health interventions, aiming to improve the understanding of researchers, clinicians, engineers, and policy makers in developing robust and impactful data-driven interventions in the health care domain. Methods: We searched the PubMed and Scopus bibliographic databases with terms related to machine learning, to identify real-life studies of digital health interventions incorporating machine learning algorithms. We grouped those interventions according to their target (ie, target condition), study design, number of enrolled participants, follow-up duration, primary outcome and whether this had been statistically significant, machine learning algorithms used in the intervention, and outcome of the algorithms (eg, prediction). Results: Our literature search identified 8 interventions incorporating machine learning in a real-life research setting, of which 3 (37%) were evaluated in a randomized controlled trial and 5 (63%) in a pilot or experimental single-group study. The interventions targeted depression prediction and management, speech recognition for people with speech disabilities, self-efficacy for weight loss, detection of changes in biopsychosocial condition of patients with multiple morbidity, stress management, treatment of phantom limb pain, smoking cessation, and personalized nutrition based on glycemic response. The average number of enrolled participants in the studies was 71 (range 8-214), and the average follow-up study duration was 69 days (range 3-180). Of the 8 interventions, 6 (75%) showed statistical significance (at the P=.05 level) in health outcomes. Conclusions: This review found that digital health interventions incorporating machine learning algorithms in real-life studies can be useful and effective. Given the low number of studies identified in this review and that they did not follow a rigorous machine learning evaluation methodology, we urge the research community to conduct further studies in intervention settings following evaluation principles and demonstrating the potential of machine learning in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Real-World Practical Evaluation Strategies: A Review of Telehealth Evaluation
    Agboola, Stephen
    Hale, Timothy M.
    Masters, Caitlin
    Kvedar, Joseph
    Jethwani, Kamal
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2014, 3 (04):
  • [2] Data Mining Algorithms and Techniques in Mental Health: A Systematic Review
    Alonso, Susel Gongora
    de la Torre-Diez, Isabel
    Hamrioui, Sofiane
    Lopez-Coronado, Miguel
    Calvo Barreno, Diego
    Moron Nozaleda, Lola
    Franco, Manuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (09)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. A practical guide to conducting research and assessment
  • [4] Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    Stiles, Carla R.
    Hagen, Neil A.
    Biondo, Patricia D.
    Cummings, Greta G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [5] A systematic review of real-world diabetes prevention programs: learnings from the last 15 years
    Aziz, Zahra
    Absetz, Pilvikki
    Oldroyd, John
    Pronk, Nicolaas P.
    Oldenburg, Brian
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
  • [6] Mental Health Smartphone Apps: Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Future Developments
    Bakker, David
    Kazantzis, Nikolaos
    Rickwood, Debra
    Rickard, Nikki
    [J]. JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 3 (01):
  • [7] Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review
    Brinker, Titus Josef
    Hekler, Achim
    Utikal, Jochen Sven
    Grabe, Niels
    Schadendorf, Dirk
    Klode, Joachim
    Berking, Carola
    Steeb, Theresa
    Enk, Alexander H.
    von Kalle, Christof
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (10)
  • [8] Buijink Arthur Willem Gerard, 2013, Evid Based Med, V18, P90, DOI 10.1136/eb-2012-100885
  • [9] Harnessing Context Sensing to Develop a Mobile Intervention for Depression
    Burns, Michelle Nicole
    Begale, Mark
    Duffecy, Jennifer
    Gergle, Darren
    Karr, Chris J.
    Giangrande, Emily
    Mohr, David C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (03) : e55
  • [10] Agile requirements engineering practices: An emprical study
    Cao, Lan
    Ramesh, Balasubramaniam
    [J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 2008, 25 (01) : 60 - 67