WHOSE KNOWLEDGE, WHOSE POWER? ETHICS IN URBAN REGENERATION PROJECTS WITH COMMUNITIES

被引:10
作者
Fenster, Tovi [1 ]
Kulka, Tal [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, PECLAB, Dept Geog & Human Geog, POB 39040, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
professional/local knowledge; power/empowerment; ethics; urban regeneration; communities; PARTICIPATORY ETHICS; POSITIONALITY;
D O I
10.1111/geob.12101
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper examines "moments of residents' awareness" and their ethics in three planning processes, each representing different relations between local and professional knowledge in the course of the three-year regeneration project in Meonot Yam neighborhood, Bat Yam, Israel. This new terminology emphasizes how nuanced relations between various types of knowledge better explain the challenges faced by planners and residents in regeneration projects. These moments reflect residents' empowerment, challenging the binary view of professional/powerful versus local/powerless knowledge that characterizes modernist thinking. The paper proposes that in such complicated processes it helps to analyze moments of power/knowledge transformation, from which one can learn that conflict and disagreement, and not only consensus, can lead to residents' empowerment.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 238
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
[11]   Memory and place in participatory planning [J].
Fenster, Tovi ;
Misgav, Chen .
PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE, 2014, 15 (03) :349-369
[12]  
Fenster Tovi., 2004, GLOBAL CITY HOLY CIT
[13]  
Fenster Tovi, 2012, Whose City Is It? Planning, Knowledge and Everyday Life
[14]  
Forester J., 1999, DELIBERATIVE PRACTIT
[15]  
Forester J., 2009, DEALING DIFFERENCES
[16]  
Foucault M, 1982, RETHINKING ARCHITECT, P367
[17]  
Friedman J., 1973, Retracking America
[18]  
Harding S., 1996, KNOWLEDGE DIFFERENCE, P431
[19]  
Healey P., 1997, Collaborative planning: Shaping places in a fragmented society
[20]   PLANNING-THEORY EMERGING PARADIGM - COMMUNICATIVE ACTION AND INTERACTIVE PRACTICE [J].
INNES, JE .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 1995, 14 (03) :183-189