Situation awareness as judgment I: Statistical modeling and quantitative measurement

被引:28
作者
Kirlik, Alex [1 ]
Strauss, Richard
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Beckman Inst, Human Factors Div, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] FatWire Software, New York, NY USA
关键词
situation awareness; operator modeling; judgment; performance measurement;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2006.01.009
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Situation awareness (SA) is a commonly used term to describe the challenges faced by human operators when interacting with controlled systems or work environments through technological interfaces. In this paper we conceptualize SA as judgment under uncertainty. As such, SA is conceived as the degree of correspondence between a set of human judgments and the distribution of true system or environmental states or events being judged. Statistical modeling and estimation techniques known as judgment analysis are used to decompose SA into seven individually measurable components for engineering analysis and design. We discuss how the model and measures complement existing qualitative models of SA (e.g., Endsley), human-automation interaction (e.g., Parasuraman, Sheridan & Wickens) and naturalistic decision making (NDM) (e.g., Klein). A companion article presents a demonstration of the judgment analysis approach to SA modeling and measurement. Relevance to industry Good situation awareness implies a high correlation between actual and judged system states. This paper provides a technique for decomposing this correlation into seven independent factors so that technology and training interventions target the specific barriers to situation awareness in any particular context or system. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 474
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   SITUATION AWARENESS AND THE COGNITIVE MANAGEMENT OF COMPLEX-SYSTEMS [J].
ADAMS, MJ ;
TENNEY, YJ ;
PEW, RW .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1995, 37 (01) :85-104
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ESSENTIAL BRUNSWIK
[3]  
BISANTZ A, 2001, IEEE T SYSTEMS MAN C, V30
[4]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF LINEAR JUDGMENT MODELS [J].
BREHMER, B .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1994, 87 (2-3) :137-154
[5]  
Brunswik E., 1956, PERCEPTION REPRESENT
[6]  
Cooksey R. W., 1996, JUDGMENT ANAL THEORY
[7]   CRITICAL DECISION METHOD - A TECHNIQUE FOR ELICITING CONCRETE ASSESSMENT INDICATORS FROM THE INTUITION OF NICU NURSES [J].
CRANDALL, B ;
GETCHELLREITER, K .
ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 1993, 16 (01) :42-51
[8]   ASSESSING SIMILARITY BETWEEN PROFILES [J].
CRONBACH, LJ ;
GLESER, GC .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1953, 50 (06) :456-473
[9]  
DURSO T, 1999, HDB APPL COGNITION, P284
[10]  
Endsley M.R., 1998, HUMAN FACTORS AIR TR