The Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle Branch Block: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

被引:50
作者
Xiong, Yunyun [1 ]
Wang, Lian [2 ]
Liu, Wenyan [3 ]
Hankey, Graeme J. [4 ]
Xu, Biao [2 ]
Wang, Shang [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Jinling Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Cardiol, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Med & Therapeut, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Western Australia, Sch Med & Pharmacol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; HEART-FAILURE; RISK-FACTORS; CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS; CONDUCTION DEFECTS; GENERAL-POPULATION; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; PREVALENCE; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1002/clc.22454
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe prognostic significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) is inconsistent across studies. We aimed to assess the association between RBBB (in general population and patients with heart disease) and risk of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (MI), and heart failure (HF). HypothesisRBBB may be associated with increased risk of death. MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to February 2015 were searched for prospective cohort studies that reported RBBB at baseline and all-cause mortality, cardiac death, MI, and HF at follow-up. A meta-analysis of published data was undertaken primarily by means of fixed-effects models. ResultsNineteen cohort studies including 201437 participants were included with a mean follow-up period ranging from 1 to 246 months. For general population with RBBB, the pooled adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.33) compared with no BBB. General population with RBBB had an increased risk of cardiac death (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17-1.74). For patients with RBBB and acute MI, the pooled risk ratio was 2.31 (95% CI: 2.13-2.49) for in-hospital mortality, 2.85 (95% CI: 2.46-3.30) for 30-day mortality, and 1.96 (95% CI: 1.59-2.42) for longer-term mortality. For acute HF patients, the pooled risk ratio of all-cause mortality was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.06-1.16), and for chronic HF patients it was 1.75 (95% CI: 1.38-2.22). ConclusionsRight bundle branch block is associated with an increased risk of mortality in general population and patients with heart disease.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 613
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Bundle branch block patterns and long-term outcomes in heart failure [J].
Abdel-Qadir, Husam M. ;
Tu, Jack V. ;
Austin, Peter C. ;
Wang, Julie T. ;
Lee, Douglas S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 146 (02) :213-218
[2]   Epidemiological pattern of myocardial infarction and modelling risk factors relevant to in-hospital mortality: the first results from the Iranian Myocardial Infarction Registry [J].
Ahmadi, Ali ;
Soori, Hamid ;
Mehrabi, Yadollah ;
Etemad, Koorosh ;
Khaledifar, Arsalan .
KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2015, 73 (06) :451-457
[3]   Frequency and prognostic implications of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy [J].
Archbold, RA ;
Sayer, JW ;
Ray, S ;
Wilkinson, P ;
Ranjadayalan, K ;
Timmis, AD .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1998, 19 (06) :893-898
[4]   The prevalence and prognostic significance of electrocardiographic abnormalities [J].
Ashley, EA ;
Raxwal, VK ;
Froelicher, VF .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 25 (01) :7-72
[5]  
Baldasseroni Samuele, 2003, Ital Heart J, V4, P607
[6]   Right bundle branch block: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome in the general population: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study [J].
Bussink, Barbara E. ;
Holst, Anders G. ;
Jespersen, Lasse ;
Deckers, Jaap W. ;
Jensen, Gorm B. ;
Prescott, Eva .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (02) :138-146
[7]   Differential clinical characteristics and prognosis of intraventricular conduction defects in patients with chronic heart failure [J].
Cinca, Juan ;
Mendez, Ana ;
Puig, Teresa ;
Ferrero, Andreu ;
Roig, Eulalia ;
Vazquez, Rafael ;
Gonzalez-Juanatey, Jose R. ;
Alonso-Pulpon, Luis ;
Delgado, Juan ;
Brugada, Josep ;
Pascual-Figal, Domingo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2013, 15 (08) :877-884
[8]   H-V INTERVAL IN PATIENTS WITH BIFASCICULAR BLOCK (RIGHT BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK AND LEFT ANTERIOR-HEMIBLOCK) - CLINICAL, ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC CORRELATIONS [J].
DENES, P ;
DHINGRA, RC ;
WU, D ;
CHUQUIMIA, R ;
AMATYLEON, F ;
WYNDHAM, C ;
ROSEN, KM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1975, 35 (01) :23-29
[9]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[10]   Bundle-branch block in middle-aged men: risk of complications and death over 28 years - The Primary Prevention Study in Goteborg, Sweden [J].
Eriksson, P ;
Wilhelmsen, L ;
Rosengren, A .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (21) :2300-2306