Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Network within Multi-Modal Public Transport Networks

被引:30
作者
Lu, Qing-Chang [1 ]
Lin, Shan [1 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Sch Elect & Control Engn, Dept Traff Informat & Control, Middle Sect, Naner Huan Rd, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
urban rail transit vulnerability; multi-modal transit network; accessibility; network interdependency; disruptions; RESILIENCE;
D O I
10.3390/su11072109
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In terms of urban rail transit network vulnerability, most studies have focused on the network topology characteristics and travel cost changes after network incidents and analyzed rail transit network independently. The neglects of passenger flow distributions on the network and alternative public transport modes under rail network disruptions would either underestimate or overestimate the vulnerability of rail transit network, and thus lead to inaccurate results and decisions. This study presents an accessibility-based measurement for urban rail transit network vulnerability analysis and explicitly accounts for rail passenger flow characteristics, travel cost changes, and alternative transit modes. It is shown that the proposed approach is capable of measuring the consequences on rail network, and the advantages of the accessibility method are demonstrated and compared. The methodology is applied to the urban rail transit network of Shenzhen, China within a multi-modal public transport network. Results reveal that the consequences of disruptions on network accessibility are obviously different for stations with different passenger flow characteristics, and some undisrupted stations are found to be vulnerable under surrounding station failures. The proposed methodology offers reliable measurements on rail transit network vulnerability and implications for decision-making under rail network disruptions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Attacker-defender models and road network vulnerability [J].
Bell, M. G. H. ;
Kanturska, U. ;
Schmocker, J.-D. ;
Fonzone, A. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2008, 366 (1872) :1893-1906
[2]  
Bhat C.R., 2002, Development of an urban accessibility index. formulations
[3]   Exposing the role of exposure: Public transport network risk analysis [J].
Cats, O. ;
Yap, M. ;
van Oort, N. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 88 :1-14
[4]   Planning for the unexpected: The value of reserve capacity for public transport network robustness [J].
Cats, Oded ;
Jenelius, Erik .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 81 :47-61
[5]   Dynamic Vulnerability Analysis of Public Transport Networks: Mitigation Effects of Real-Time Information [J].
Cats, Oded ;
Jenelius, Erik .
NETWORKS & SPATIAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 14 (3-4) :435-463
[6]   Network-based accessibility measures for vulnerability analysis of degradable transportation networks [J].
Chen, Anthony ;
Yang, Chao ;
Kongsomsaksakul, Sirisak ;
Lee, Ming .
NETWORKS & SPATIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 7 (03) :241-256
[7]   Vulnerability analysis for large-scale and congested road networks with demand uncertainty [J].
Chen, Bi Yu ;
Lam, William H. K. ;
Sumalee, Agachai ;
Li, Qingquan ;
Li, Zhi-Chun .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (03) :501-516
[8]   Analysis of Transportation Network Vulnerability Under Flooding Disasters [J].
Chen, Xian-Zhe ;
Lu, Qing-Chang ;
Pang, Zhong-Ren ;
Ash, John Eugene .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2015, (2532) :37-44
[9]   Transportation security and the role of resilience: A foundation for operational metrics [J].
Cox, Andrew ;
Prager, Fynnwin ;
Rose, Adam .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2011, 18 (02) :307-317
[10]   Evaluating passenger robustness in a rail transit network [J].
De-Los-Santos, Alicia ;
Laporte, Gilbert ;
Mesa, Juan A. ;
Perea, Federico .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 20 (01) :34-46