Effect of selection of QTc formula on eligibility of cancer patients for phase I clinical trials

被引:5
作者
Borad, Mitesh J. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Soman, Arundhati D. [1 ]
Benjamin, Martin [2 ]
Casa, Daniel [2 ]
Tembe, Waibhav D. [3 ]
Piper, Barbara F. [4 ]
Ramanathan, Ramesh [2 ,3 ]
Tibes, Raoul [2 ,3 ]
Jameson, Gayle [2 ]
Ansaldo, Karen [4 ]
Von Hoff, Daniel D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[2] TGen Clin Res Serv, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Translat Genom Res Inst, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Scottsdale Healthcare, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Hematol Oncol, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
关键词
QT; QTc; Phase I cancer clinical trial; TORSADES-DE-POINTES; RATE-CORRECTED QT; HEART-RATE; VENTRICULAR REPOLARIZATION; ONCOLOGY THERAPEUTICS; DOLASETRON MESYLATE; PROLONGATION; INTERVAL; FLUOXETINE; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10637-012-9909-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A retrospective analysis of 130 patients was conducted in a Phase I oncology clinic to assess the effect of QTc formula selection on clinical trial eligibility. QTc values were calculated from screening electrocardiograms using 7 formulae (Bazett, Fridericia, Framingham, Hodges, Mayeda, Van de Water and Wohlfart). QTc values > 470 ms for females and > 450 ms for males were used to define prolongation. Concomitant medication potential for QTc prolongation was determined using a public database (AzCert). Ineligibility rates ranged from 3.1 % to 17.7 % (Framingham: 3.1 %, Van de Water: 3.1 %, Hodges: 3.1 %, Wohlfart: 3.1 %, Fridericia: 3.9 %, Bazett: 10.8 % and Mayeda: 17.7 %). A consistent ineligibility rate was achieved by using formulae-specific thresholds. Fifty one percent of patients were taking concomitant medications with QTc prolongation potential. The proportion of concomitant medications with the potential to prolong QTc was 11.57 % (96 of 830). Uniform criteria and guidelines for selection of QTc formulae need to be developed. Formulae-specific QTc thresholds also need to be specified.
引用
收藏
页码:1056 / 1065
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], POINTS CONS ASS POT
  • [2] Arizona CERT (Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics), 2012, QT DRUG LIST RISK GR
  • [3] Bazett JC, 1920, HEART, V7, P353
  • [4] Single-blind study of the effects of intravenous dolasetron mesylate versus ondansetron on electrocardiographic parameters in normal volunteers
    Benedict, CR
    Arbogast, R
    Martin, L
    Patton, L
    Morrill, B
    Hahne, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 28 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [5] Cardiovascular effects of i.v. granisetron at two administration rates and of ondansetron in healthy adults
    Boike, SC
    Ilson, B
    Zariffa, N
    Jorkasky, DK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1997, 54 (10) : 1172 - 1176
  • [6] Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials
    Comis, RL
    Miller, JD
    Aldigé, CR
    Krebs, L
    Stoval, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) : 830 - 835
  • [7] Prescription of QT-prolonging drugs in a cohort of about 5 million outpatients
    Curtis, LH
    Ostbye, T
    Sendersky, V
    Hutchison, S
    Lapointe, NMA
    Al-Khatib, SM
    Yasuda, SU
    Dans, PE
    Wright, A
    Califf, RM
    Woosley, RL
    Schulman, KA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 114 (02) : 135 - 141
  • [8] Modulation of QT interval during autonomic nervous system blockade in humans
    Diedrich, A
    Jordan, J
    Shannon, JR
    Robertson, D
    Biaggioni, I
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (17) : 2238 - 2243
  • [9] Circadian modulation of QT rate dependence in healthy volunteers - Gender and age differences
    Extramiana, F
    Maison-Blanche, P
    Badilini, F
    Pinoteau, J
    Deseo, T
    Coumel, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 1999, 32 (01) : 33 - 43
  • [10] Safety biomarkers and the clinical development of oncology therapeutics: Considerations for cardiovascular safety and risk management
    Fingert, H
    Varterasian, M
    [J]. AAPS JOURNAL, 2006, 8 (01) : E89 - E94