The Anaphor Agreement Effect is not about featural deficiency: Evidence from Avar

被引:10
作者
Rudnev, Pavel [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Moscow, Russia
来源
GLOSSA-A JOURNAL OF GENERAL LINGUISTICS | 2020年 / 5卷 / 01期
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
syntax; morphosyntax; AAE; binding; finiteness; agreement; Avar; ARGUMENT STRUCTURE;
D O I
10.5334/gigl.907
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This paper discusses two analyses of the Anaphor Agreement Effect (AAE, Rizzi 1990) in the light of novel data from Avar. By demonstrating that Avar anaphors trigger full, non-trivial agreement on the phi-probe, I argue that the Avar data instantiate a genuine exception to the AAE. I then compare two competing analyses of binding and the ME: an account whereby anaphoric dependencies arise via the syntactic operation Agree (Murugesan 2019), and a theory deriving the inability of the anaphors' phi-features to trigger full agreement from the presence of additional structural layers inside the anaphors that render the features inaccessible (Preminger 2019). I claim that the absence of the AAE in Avar is in line with the encapsulation analysis whereas the Agree-based analysis is unsuccessful.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 35 条
[31]  
Sundaresan Sandhya., 2016, The impact of pronominal form on interpretation, P77, DOI [10.1515/9781614517016-004, DOI 10.1515/9781614517016-004]
[32]  
Svenonius Peter., 2008, Tromso Working Papers in Language Linguistics: Nordlyd 35, special issue on Complex Predication, P47, DOI DOI 10.7557/12.137
[33]  
Testelets Ya. G., 1998, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, P35
[34]   More on the anaphor agreement effect [J].
Woolford, E .
LINGUISTIC INQUIRY, 1999, 30 (02) :257-287
[35]  
Wurmbrand S., 2001, Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure