共 54 条
Development and Evaluation of a Prediction Model for Underestimated Invasive Breast Cancer in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ at Stereotactic Large Core Needle Biopsy
被引:14
作者:
Diepstraten, Suzanne C. E.
[1
]
van de Ven, Stephanie M. W. Y.
[2
]
Pijnappel, Ruud M.
[1
]
Peeters, Petra H. M.
[3
]
van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
[1
]
Verkooijen, Helena M.
[1
]
Elias, Sjoerd G.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源:
关键词:
LYMPH-NODE BIOPSY;
DIAGNOSIS;
DISEASE;
RISK;
MICROCALCIFICATION;
RECOMMENDATIONS;
MANAGEMENT;
IMPUTATION;
SPECIMENS;
LESIONS;
D O I:
10.1371/journal.pone.0077826
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
Background: We aimed to develop a multivariable model for prediction of underestimated invasiveness in women with ductal carcinoma in situ at stereotactic large core needle biopsy, that can be used to select patients for sentinel node biopsy at primary surgery. Methods: From the literature, we selected potential preoperative predictors of underestimated invasive breast cancer. Data of patients with nonpalpable breast lesions who were diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ at stereotactic large core needle biopsy, drawn from the prospective COBRA (Core Biopsy after RAdiological localization) and COBRA2000 cohort studies, were used to fit the multivariable model and assess its overall performance, discrimination, and calibration. Results: 348 women with large core needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ were available for analysis. In 100 (28.7%) patients invasive carcinoma was found at subsequent surgery. Nine predictors were included in the model. In the multivariable analysis, the predictors with the strongest association were lesion size (OR 1.12 per cm, 95% CI 0.98-1.28), number of cores retrieved at biopsy (OR per core 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-1.01), presence of lobular cancerization (OR 5.29, 95% CI 1.25-26.77), and microinvasion (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.42-9.87). The overall performance of the multivariable model was poor with an explained variation of 9% (Nagelkerke's R-2), mediocre discrimination with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.58-0.73), and fairly good calibration. Conclusion: The evaluation of our multivariable prediction model in a large, clinically representative study population proves that routine clinical and pathological variables are not suitable to select patients with large core needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ for sentinel node biopsy during primary surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文