Factors for collaboration amongst smart city stakeholders: A local government perspective

被引:32
作者
Clement, Jessica [1 ]
Manjon, Miguel [1 ,2 ]
Crutzen, Nathalie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Smart City Inst, HEC Sch Management, Liege, Belgium
[2] Univ Rovira & Virgili, ECOSOS Dept Econ, Tarragona, Spain
关键词
Collaborative ecosystems; Smart city; Local public administrations; Digital government; Contingency theory; Quadruple-helix framework; CONTINGENCY THEORY; CITIES; GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; EVOLUTION; MANAGEMENT; LESSONS; SECTOR; ROLES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2022.101746
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
A collaborative ecosystem of diverse stakeholders is seen as critical in smart cities for solving complex public problems and overcoming socio-technical hurdles. However, little is known about the factors that may increase collaboration amongst smart city stakeholders. Through a digital government lens, we first elaborate the nature of multi-stakeholder collaboration in the smart city. Then, we adopt a contingency approach to unpack the factors that affect the intensity of collaboration between the stakeholders in the smart city ecosystem. To characterize the ecosystem, we use the quadruple-helix framework. Through the perspective of the local government, we derive hypotheses on whether certain factors lead to more intensive collaboration, which are tested on a sample of Belgian municipalities. Our findings reveal the importance of smart city strategies for intensifying collaboration between the local government and stakeholders in the ecosystem. Moreover, we also find that for large ecosystems, a smart city manager or department may facilitate collaboration amongst stakeholders. Taken together, our findings indicate that there are certain configurational approaches to increasing collaboration in smart cities, which will depend on the context of a city.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 83 条
[41]  
Katz D., 1978, The social psychology of organizations, V2nd
[42]   Smart City Planning from an Evolutionary Perspective [J].
Komninos, N. ;
Kakderi, C. ;
Panori, A. ;
Tsarchopoulos, P. .
JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 26 (02) :3-20
[43]  
Komninos N, 2019, CITIES SERIES, P1
[44]   The emergence and evolution of cross-boundary research collaborations: An explanatory study of social dynamics in a digital government working group [J].
Ku, Minyoung ;
Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon ;
Zhang, Jing .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2016, 33 (04) :796-806
[45]   Smart cities and the citizen-driven internet of things: A qualitative inquiry into an emerging smart city [J].
Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy ;
Crutzen, Nathalie .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 140 :44-53
[46]   The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective [J].
Leydesdorff, Loet ;
Deakin, Mark .
JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02) :53-63
[47]  
Luo YD, 2002, J MANAGE, V28, P669, DOI 10.1177/014920630202800506
[48]   Green and digital entrepreneurship in smart cities [J].
Manjon, Miguel ;
Aouni, Zineb ;
Crutzen, Nathalie .
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (02) :429-462
[49]   Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance [J].
Meijer, Albert ;
Rodriguez Bolivar, Manuel Pedro .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 82 (02) :392-408
[50]   Defining the Role of the Smart-City Manager: An Analysis of Responsibilities and Skills [J].
Michelucci, Fania Valeria ;
De Marco, Alberto ;
Tanda, Adriano .
JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 23 (03) :23-42