The practicalities and pitfalls of establishing a policy-relevant and cost-effective soil biological monitoring scheme

被引:35
作者
Faber, Jack H.
Creamer, Rachel E.
Mulder, Christian
Roembke, Joerg
Rutgers, Michiel
Sousa, J. Paulo
Stone, Dorothy
Griffiths, Bryan S.
机构
[1] Alterra, Wageningen UR, 6700AA Wageningen
[2] Teagasc, Environment, Soils and Land Use Research Department, Johnstown Castle
[3] National Institute for Public Health, The Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven
[4] ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Flörsheim am Main
[5] Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Frankfurt am Main
[6] IMAR-CMA, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra
关键词
Bioindicators; Ecological risk assessment; Ecosystem services; Soil biological monitoring; Soil Framework Directive; INDICATORS; HEALTH; AGROECOSYSTEMS; BIOGEOGRAPHY; SERVICES; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.1398
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A large number of biological indicators have been proposed over the years for assessing soil quality. Although many of those have been applied in monitoring schemes across Europe, no consensus exists on the extent to which these indicators might perform best and how monitoring schemes can be further optimized in terms of scientific and policy relevance. Over the past decade, developments in environmental monitoring and risk assessment converged toward the use of indicators and endpoints that are related to soil functioning and ecosystem services. In view of the proposed European Union (EU) Soil Framework Directive, there is an urgent need to identify and evaluate indicators for soil biodiversity and ecosystem services. The recently started integrated project, Ecological Function and Biodiversity Indicators in European Soils (EcoFINDERS), aims to address this specific issue within the EU Framework Program FP7. Here, we 1) discuss how to use the concept of ecosystem services in soil monitoring, 2) review former and ongoing monitoring schemes, and 3) present an analysis of metadata on biological indicators in some EU member states. Finally, we discuss our experiences in establishing a logical sieve approach to devise a monitoring scheme for a standardized and harmonized application at European scale. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2013; 9: 276284. (c) 2013 SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 284
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, BIOL SOIL COMMUNITY, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198525035.001.0001
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, REPORT EUROPEAN COMM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, COMMUNITIES ECOSYSTE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 712910005 RIVM
[5]  
[Anonymous], GLOB BIOD OUTL 3
[6]  
Bardgett R. D., 2005, BIOL DIVERSITY FUNCT
[7]   Using soil health to assess ecotoxicological impacts of pollutants on soil microflora [J].
Becaert, Valerie ;
Deschenes, Louise .
REVIEWS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, VOL 188, 2006, 188 :127-148
[8]  
Bispo A., 2009, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, V5, P717, DOI 10.1897/IEAM-2009-064.1
[9]  
Bispo A, 2007, ENVASSO ENV ASS SOIL
[10]   Ecological classification and assessment concepts in soil protection [J].
Breure, AM ;
Mulder, C ;
Römbke, J ;
Ruf, A .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2005, 62 (02) :211-229