Evaluating the Risk Assessment Approach of the REACH Legislation: A Case Study

被引:6
作者
Landberg, Hanna E. [1 ]
Hedmer, Maria [1 ]
Westberg, Hakan [2 ]
Tinnerberg, Hakan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Div Occupat & Environm Med, Dept Lab Med, Fac Med, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Med, Orebro, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Med, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
exposure assessment; exposure assessment models; exposure scenarios; occupational hygiene; occupational exposure; REACH; risk assessment; risk characterization ratio; EXPOSURE; STOFFENMANAGER; TOOLS; RELIABILITY; INFORMATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1093/annweh/wxy090
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Risk assessments based on occupational exposure to chemicals have increased since REACH (European regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and restriction of Chemicals) came into force. The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) recommends that chemical exposure could be calculated using exposure models and that parameters used to calculate the exposure scenario (ES) should be communicated in extended safety data sheets (e-SDS) as workplace instructions which downstream users are obligated to follow. We aimed to evaluate REACH's risk assessment approach using the Stoffenmanager((R)) 6.1, the Advanced REACH Tool 1.5 (ART), and the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals' targeted risk assessment (ECETOC TRA 3.1) exposure models. We observed 239 scenarios in three companies handling chemicals using 45 e-SDS. Risk characterization ratios (RCRs) were calculated by dividing estimated exposures by derived no-effect levels (DNELs). Observed RCRs were much lower than registered RCRs, indicating lower exposures. However, about 12% of the observed ES still had RCRs > 1, after adjustment for control measures and personal protections described in the ES, when using Stoffenmanager((R)). The ES with observed RCRs > 1 were the same by Stoffenmanager((R)) and ART, but not by ECETOC TRA. Stoffenmanager and ART identified 25 adjusted scenarios with RCR > 1, while ECETOC TRA gave RCR < 1 for the same scenarios. The ES with RCR > 1 were significantly associated to chemicals with higher vapour pressure and lower DNELs than ES with RCR < 1 by Stoffenmanager((R)). The correlations between observed and registered RCRs were lower than those between RCRs calculated from the different models themselves; ECETOC TRA had the lowest correlation with the registered ES. These results put in question the generic ES recommended under the REACH legislation. Downstream users may get better estimates by assessing their own ES, especially for chemicals with low DNELs and high vapour pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 76
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating the Control Banding Nanotool: a qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures
    Zalk, David M.
    Paik, Samuel Y.
    Swuste, Paul
    JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (07) : 1685 - 1704
  • [32] Risk assessment due to use of chemicals in a toxicological laboratory: A case study
    Dimitriou, A.
    Tsoukali, H.
    Proceeding of the 9th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Vol B - Poster Presentations, 2005, : B164 - B168
  • [33] The Health Risk Assessment Performed in California for the Herbicide Simazine: A Case Study
    Silva, Marilyn H.
    Dong, Michael H.
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2015, 21 (06): : 1496 - 1517
  • [34] Testing and risk assessment of persistent and bioaccumulating chemical substances -: Improvements within REACH?
    Breitholtz, Magnus
    Eriksson, Johan
    Green, Nicholas
    Ruden, Christina
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2006, 12 (04): : 782 - 805
  • [35] Evaluating risks of biological control introductions: A probabilistic risk-assessment approach
    Wright, MG
    Hoffmann, MP
    Kuhar, TP
    Gardner, J
    Pitcher, SA
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2005, 35 (03) : 338 - 347
  • [36] Probabilistic approach to evaluating seismicity in CO2 storage risk assessment
    Ayash, Scott C.
    Dobroskok, Anastasia A.
    Sorensen, James A.
    Wolfe, Stephanie L.
    Steadman, Edward N.
    Harju, John A.
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 2487 - 2494
  • [37] Risk assessment of intimate partner violent reoffending: A longitudinal study with the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment guide
    Arbach, Karin
    Folino, Jorge
    ANUARIO DE PSICOLOGIA JURIDICA, 2021, 31 (01): : 35 - 44
  • [38] Risk assessment in practice: A real case study
    Benini, Marco
    Sicari, Sabrina
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 31 (15) : 3691 - 3699
  • [39] Formal Specification and Risk Assessment Approach of Integrated Complex System: A Case Study in IMA Domain
    Ren, Fuchun
    Zhao, Tingdi
    Wang, Hongli
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 2015 ICRSE, 2015,
  • [40] A practical approach for seismic risk assessment of underground structures: A case study of Iranian subway tunnels
    Moayedifar, Arsham
    Nejati, Hamid Reza
    Nazerigivi, Amin
    Khosrotash, Mohammad
    EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2019, 32 (02) : 64 - 71